The growth of nationalism during the 19th and early 20th century had several consequences, but the most relevant were: the inevitable collision between nationalist states that wanted to have control on territory and population that speak the same national language (like the Franco-Prussian war in 1871); the collapse of big European multinational states (like the Austro-Hungarian Empire after WWI); and the rise of extremist nationalist ideologies that took control of many powerful European states.
Under these circumstances, the way in which powerful European states responded to the growth of nationalism can be divided into two fronts, first, there were some relevant states that embraced extremist nationalist ideologies and eventually were ruled by its premises and an offensive foreign policy towards its neighbors, like Fascism in Italy and Nazism in Germany. And second, other powerful states, like the UK and France, did not align with extremist nationalism but rather remained under a liberal and democratic form of government and a more defensive position. In general terms, World War II was the final clash between these two ideologies.
Explanation:
Representative democracy is a form of democracy in which people vote for representatives who then vote on policy initiatives as opposed to a direct democracy, a form of democracy in which people vote on policy initiatives directly.
Direct democracy was not what the framers of the United States Constitution envisioned for the nation. They saw a danger in tyranny of the majority. As a result, they advocated a representative democracy in the form of a constitutional republic over a direct democracy
Answer:
D. The source is not credible because it contains more opinions than facts.
Explanation:
From the analysis of the excerpt, information of the author, and the source of the material, it can be concluded that " The source is not credible because it contains more opinions than facts."
This is evident in that, the author is a high school student which does not make him "an authority" in the subject. Also, the website is not a reliable source for peer-reviewed or scholarly articles.
Also, there were a series of recorded conflicts, fights, or wars between the European settlers and the Native Americans. For example Proclamation of 1763 & Pontiac's War, Battle of Point Pleasant, etc.
Hence, the correct answer is option D
The correct answer for this would be the last option. The statement in which a farmer would disagree on the US constitution is that, the government <span>works best when it gives the unlimited right. There should be no unlimited right since this would only cause problems and conflict. Hope this answers the question. </span>
C manifest Destiny im pretty sure
