Answer:
hi tj Wrangler Rubicon unlimited data for over image you will have the same day I know that you can see it on to the other side is not the same the first one to you and I have to go with further instructions once you get the best regards for and you are interested then you have a nice weekend as I can get a new window for your help with your message and regards Dr mark you as well but the only one that I have a nice weekend and we will have the same the first one to one another to get you
It seems that the BJP government’s decision to illegalise the sale of cattle for slaughter at animal markets has its roots in a PIL that quotes the five-yearly Gadhimai festival in Nepal, where thousands of buffaloes are taken from India to be sacrificed to ‘appease’ Gadhimai, the goddess of power.
The contradictions that emerge from cattle – here encompassing all bovines – slaughter rules in Nepal perplex many: despite being predominantly Hindu, animal sacrifice continues to be practised. Cow slaughter is explicitly prohibited even in Nepal’s new constitution since it is the national animal, yet the ritual sacrifice of buffaloes and the consumption of their meat is not frowned upon. There is also, in marked contrast to the Indian government’s blanket approach to cattle terminology, a lucid distinction between cows (both the male and female) and other ‘cattle’ species (such as buffaloes and yaks).
The emergence of this contradictory, often paradoxical, approach to cattle slaughter in Nepal is the result of a careful balancing act by the rulers of modern Nepal. The Shah dynasty and the Rana prime ministers often found themselves at a crossroads to explicitly define the rules of cattle slaughter. As rulers of a perceived ‘asal Hindu-sthan’, their dharma bound them to protect the cow – the House of Gorkha borrows its name from the Sanskrit ‘gou-raksha’ – but as they expanded into an empire, their stringent Brahminic rules came into conflict with des-dharma, or existing local customs, where cattle-killing was a norm. What followed was an intentionally ambiguous approach to cattle slaughter, an exercise in social realpolitik.
Answer:
Option B. Hannah's teammates sending mean text messages about her to a large group of classmates is an example of <u>cyber-bullying.</u>
Explanation:
Bullying is defined as the repeated and habitual use of force, coercion, or threat, to abuse someone or aggressively intimidate and/or dominate that person. Cyber-bullying is a form of bullying but using electronic means. This type of aggression has become increasingly common due to the massive use of electronic devices for everyday life, and especially between teenagers. When Hanna's teammates send mean texts messages about her to her peers, they are cyber-bullying her.
C, im not 100% SURE but I beleive its the answer,