Television can create a shared experience and a feeling that people are members of a collective, despite lacking in proximity to one another. This is called:<u> Imagined communities</u>
<h3>What is Imagined communities?</h3>
In his 1983 book Imagined Communities, Benedict Anderson introduced the idea of an imagined community as a way to examine nationalism. According to Anderson, a country is a socially constructed community that its citizens who identify as belonging to a particular group imagine.
<h3>What does the concept imagined communities refer to?</h3>
Imagined communities are groups of people who all identify as part of a single community even if they may never interact with the majority of the other group members.
To know more about Imagined communities visit:
brainly.com/question/24256713
#SPJ4
Answer: false but the answer is functionalists theory
Explanation:
Symbolic interactionist does not view education as the elevator to social mobility but functionalists theorists view education as the "elevator" to social mobility. The Improvements in the educational achievement levels that is measured in number of years of schooling completed of the poor, people of color, and white women have been cited as evidence that students' abilities are now more important than their class, race, or gender. The functionalist theory is very impartul because it looks at every aspect of society, how it functions, and how that helps society function and shows us how our society can be balanced,it also helps combine all aspects of society to meet the needs of the individuals in the society.
A reasonable view of the choice of using your friend as expert testimony is <u>D. The friend’s </u><u>insights</u> are valuable as peer testimony.
<h3>What is peer testimony?</h3>
Peer testimony is a testimony given by a person without the required specialist expertise in a particular matter.
Peer testimony serves as an assertion made by someone who has experience or knowledge of a particular matter. For example, your friend who has a brother with childhood Type I diabetes.
Thus, a reasonable view of the choice of using your friend as expert testimony is <u>Option D</u>.
Learn more about peer testimony at brainly.com/question/4214423
Answer:
The main point here on the appeal would be the fact that the Sherrods decided to stay silent on the last offer made by the Kidds to settle the situation, and rather decided to go ahead and look for a mandatory arbitration. When the Sherrods did that, the Kidds might have understood that they were not accepting their offer for 34.000 dollars and preffered to settle for the result of the mandatory arbitration, which established the price at 25.000 dollars.
Another point is that there was a big time lapse between the last offer made by the Kidds to settle with the Sherrods and their communicating that they would go for that final settlement offer, especially after the mandatory arbitration had already established a new price. This time lapse should also be taken in favor of the Kidds in their appeal
Finally, the matter should have ended when the final decision for the arbitration was given
So it should be expected that on appeal the decision reached in the mandatory arbritration be upheld, instead of the new sum which was initially assumed not accepted by the Sherrods when they went through with the arbitration.
