Answer:
B and C
Explanation:
They're the only two options which don't repeat the phrases from the original text.
Resumegenius.com
or just look up free cover letter builders online that's what I did.
Answer:
1. Part that includes subject and main action
- Dr. Nima Mesgarani and his team are developing
2. Part that is a detail about the subject
- Professor of electrical engineering
3. Part that is the outcome of the main action
- technology that may someday translate people's thought into electronically produced speech.
Explanation:
I have been able to match each sentence to the part the question answers.
In no. 1 you discover that it mentions the name of the subject and his team and also informed us the action they are carrying out: "developing".
In no. 2, we see that the information/detail of the subject was clearly stated, that he is "Professor of electrical engineering".
In no. 3, we are giving the outcome of the main action. The outcome is that the technology that is being developed may someday translate people's thought into electronically produced speech.
Since this is an opinion question you can take it either way.
Pros:
- lower speed may cause lower speed accidents, which are less deadly than their high speed alternatives
- lower speed could potentially allow people to get lost less often because they are able to navigate and respond earlier
<span>- gas savings from optimal operating conditions (between 88.5 - 96.5 km/h [55-60 mph])</span>
Cons:
- longer commute times
- less enjoyable (if you enjoy driving fast)
- may contribute to overall congestion and increase in accidents as people spend more time on average on the roads
Either way, support our opinion and you'll be right.
B - conscience. Unconscionable means 'not right or reasonable'
