1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mafiozo [28]
3 years ago
6

In wat ways did the end of the old order move the revolution toward a more radical phase?

History
1 answer:
netineya [11]3 years ago
3 0

In regard to the French Revolution ...

The end of the <em>ancien regime, </em>or the old order, moved the Revolution to a more radical phase for several reasons and in several ways:

  • The old order had been based on a social hierarchy of kings and nobles, along with ranking clergy, ruling over the majority population of the country.  Once that social hierarchy was ended, there were questions of how fully <u>equal</u> all citizens should be under the Revolution's banner of "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity."   The radical phase of the Revolution pushed for absolute equality of all citizens, which meant attacking also the wealthy bourgeois class of merchants and professionals.  There were even some voices calling for what would essentially be a communist society.  That was the message of François-Noël Babeuf (nicknamed "Gracchus" after the 2nd century Roman reformer).  The change from a hierarchical society toward one in which there was more economic and political equality became gradually more radical.
  • The old order was broken and didn't work well, but the new order established in the French Republic was not working well either.  The economic problems of the nation persisted and were not easily solved. That led to more radical measures being imposed and implemented to try to balance the budget -- seizing lands that had been held by the church or the wealthy.  
  • The old order had demanded loyalty to an absolute monarchy.  In ending that political model and creating a new republic based on the rights of individuals as citizens, the hope was that greater liberty and fraternity would exist in the nation.  However, the new order found it necessary to enforce loyalty to the Republic and its ideas.  That meant a more radical phase that demanded absolute loyalty to the new path of the nation.  It got to the point that anyone who was suspected of disloyalty to the Republic was arrested and many were executed during what is called the "Reign of Terror."  So the new order became as radically absolute in its loyalty demands as the old order had been in its traditional expectations.

You might be interested in
50 POINTS!!<br><br>was the us becoming an imperial power a good or bad thing explain.
Lelechka [254]
When it comes to the us becoming a imperial power, their main goal was economic expansion. now their ideals were good but since they started being an imperial power the economy has gone rather worse. so to answer your question their goals were good not have not been achieved.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the Roman army destroy Jerusalem in 70 CE?
yarga [219]
The Jews living there rebelled against their Roman reign. Emperor Nero decided that what they did wasn't okay, and he launched an attack against Jerusalem, the Jews' religious stronghold. 
It turned into a slaughterfest of Legionnaires killing Jews and ransacking the city. This eventually led to the Romans burning down and destroying the Jews' Temple that served as the center of Judaism. 
6 0
3 years ago
When it comes to historical research, which type of source (primary or secondary) do you think is better?
Arada [10]

Answer:

Primary sources, because they can be more accurate about a certain incident or event.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
What are the essential elements for a democracy
RideAnS [48]

Answer:

All people treated Equally under the LAW.

Idea of civil rights/ equal opportunity.

Protection of civil liberties—freedom of thought and action.

People have the right to make choices and decisions even if they are bad ones.

Individual rights are limited by the rights of others. (Yelling Fire in a crowded building).

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
German philosophers used this word to describe their belief that each nation has its own unique spirit. German nationalists argu
FinnZ [79.3K]

Answer: Volksgeist

Explanation:

I took the K-12 quiz and got this right!

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which were the three parts of the new Roman republic?
    15·1 answer
  • What law created the process for a territory to become a state
    11·1 answer
  • What do you think are the two most important ways the cotton kingdom transformed the lives of African Americans, and why?
    13·1 answer
  • Describe how Father de Mora used slaves to mine the gold.
    12·2 answers
  • Why did scientists and scholars go to egypt
    9·1 answer
  • What is near to Richmond City?
    11·1 answer
  • The final act in the u.s. war against the plains indians took place at
    10·1 answer
  • Is this statement true or false?
    14·2 answers
  • Emperor Montezuma falls from power. • Large numbers of Native Americans died from smallpox and other diseases. These events occu
    15·1 answer
  • Y’all I’m stressing right now please help me
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!