1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
inessss [21]
3 years ago
14

Match the leader with his nation:

History
2 answers:
eimsori [14]3 years ago
8 0
1. Georges Clemenceau - France
2. David Lloyd George - Great Brittain
3. Woodrow Wilson - United States
4. Vittorio Orlando - Italy
sattari [20]3 years ago
3 0

Leaders and their nations are paired in the following way:

1. Georges Benjamin Clemenceau was French Prime Minister during the First World War - France

2. David Lloyd George was the British statesman as well as the premier of the United Kingdom - Great Britain

3. Woodrow Wilson was American statesmen and 28th President of the US, among other things, was the President during the First World War - United States

4. Vittorio Orlando  was the Italian statesman and prime minister during the final years of the First World War, represented Italy in the Paris  Peace Conference - Italy

It is common for all of them that they were leaders during and around the First World War.

You might be interested in
I knew I could never let Mom hear the messages, because protecting her is one of my most important raisons d’être, so what I did
asambeis [7]

The correct answer is B. I hope this helps

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do we call the migration of the Jews all over the world?
tia_tia [17]

For generations, Jews across the globe have embraced a common, master narrative of Jewish migration in modern times that traces its origins to widespread acts of anti-Jewish violence, often referred to as pogroms, that propelled millions of Jews from the dark hinterlands of Eastern Europe into the warm, supportive embrace of their current, “Western” societies, ranging from the United States to Israel to Australia. In North America, Israel, and other new (or at the very least renewed) Jewish communities, definitive bastions of Jewish memory, society, and culture – like The National Museum of American Jewish History in Philadelphia and Beit Hatfutsot: The Museum of the Jewish People on Tel Aviv University's campus – tell and retell a widely-accepted narrative of Jewish migration in which Jews who flee violence and oppression in Eastern Europe are rescued, if not saved, by the very act of migration. In these, and innumerable other cases, Jewish migration in the modern era is repeatedly presented as a willful act of secular self-salvation. Mirroring and at times even bolstering the story of the biblical Exodus from ancient Egypt, these modern, secular versions of traditional Jewish accounts of slavery, flight, and redemption repeatedly serve as fundamental components of contemporary Jewish society, culture, and self.

In response to the prevailing influence of these and related myths of Jewish crisis, flight, and rescue, scholars as definitive as Salo Baron have long argued that the predominance of the so-called lachrymose conception of Jewish history ultimately warps popular and academic conceptions of both the Jewish past and present. As Baron noted in a retrospective essay first published in 1963: “[ … ] an overemphasis on Jewish sufferings distorted the total picture of the Jewish historic evolution and, at the same time, badly served a generation which had become impatient with the nightmare of endless persecutions and massacres.”1 Despite these and related attempts to revise the lachrymose conception of Jewish history as well as the large-scale social, political, and economic changes that have changed the very face of Jewish society over the past century and a half, the traditional historical paradigm of persecution, flight, and refuge continues to shape popular and even scholarly accounts of Jewish migration and history in modern times.2 The continued salience of this master narrative touches upon several key methodological questions in the study of Jewish migration and history. The first issue that the prominent place of anti-Jewish persecution and violence raises is the problematic, long-debated place of antisemitism as both a defining characteristic and driving force in the long course of Jewish history.3 A second issue related to the prominent place of anti-Jewish violence in popular and academic interpretations of Jewish history, in particular, and of European history, in general, is a parallel tendency to view the vast terrain of Eastern Europe as an area pre-destined to, if not defined by, inter-ethnic tensions, hatred, and violence.4 Lastly, the persecution, flight, and rescue narrative of Jewish migration and history very often ends up bolstering triumphalist views of the Jewish present, whether they be embraced and touted in New York, Tel Aviv, or Toronto.

7 0
2 years ago
The latest new party formed in the united states in an election year was
-BARSIC- [3]
The chinese formed the party
8 0
3 years ago
What is a monopoly in Ancient China?
AleksAgata [21]
The Emperor Wu also established a government monopoly in the trade in grain.
3 0
3 years ago
Naming brainlyest
vichka [17]

Answer:

here you go :)

Explanation:

Born into obscurity in the British West Indies, Alexander Hamilton made his reputation during the Revolutionary War and became one of America’s most influential Founding Fathers. He was an impassioned champion of a strong federal government, and played a key role in defending and ratifying the U.S. Constitution.

Alexander Hamilton was an American statesman, politician, legal scholar, military commander, lawyer, banker, and economist. He was one of the Founding Fathers of the United States. He was an influential interpreter and promoter of the U.S. Constitution, as well as the founder of the nation's financial system, the Federalist Party, the United States Coast Guard, and the New York Post newspaper. As the first secretary of the treasury, Hamilton was the main author of the economic policies of George Washington's administration. He took the lead in the federal government's funding of the states' debts, as well as establishing the nation's first two de facto central banks, the Bank of North America and the First Bank of the United States, a system of tariffs, and friendly trade relations with Britain. His vision included a strong central government led by a vigorous executive branch, a strong commercial economy, government-controlled banks, support for manufacturing, and a strong military.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How was the 1960 presidential election a new kind of campaign?
    8·1 answer
  • Three months after independence was declared in 1776, which state adopted a new state constitution with only a one-house legisla
    10·1 answer
  • In what way does the executive branch influence the laws passed by congress
    7·1 answer
  • What statements about the subcontinent are accurate?
    7·1 answer
  • Anti-federalists opposed ratification of the constitution until they were assured that ?
    13·2 answers
  • At the end of which of the following wars was Carthage destroyed?
    14·1 answer
  • Identify two characteristics of the baroque style of art
    8·1 answer
  • Hello please help i’ll give brainliest
    7·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP I’LL GIVE BRAINLIEST
    9·1 answer
  • How did mongolian rule in russia differ from mongolian rule in china?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!