The agency that would be most directly involved in assisting victims made homeless by the severe flooding in Houston, Texas is the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Thus the correct answer is C.
<h3>What is FEMA?</h3>
FEMA is the federal agency in charge of organizing the nation's goal of preparing for, protecting, managing, and recovering from natural disasters, artificial calamities, and terrorist attacks.
The Agency FEMA helps mitigate people stuck in disasters, being prepared for the emergency, showing immediate response to the events that occurred, and recovering people from diverse situations.
FEMA officials are responsible for maintaining a diverse workforce, diversity management is an important component of their job. FEMA's mission is to increase citizens' abilities to fight and defend themselves against potential threats.
Therefore, option C the Federal Emergency Management Agency is the appropriate answer.
Learn more about FEMA, here:
brainly.com/question/14314780
#SPJ1
The Southerners were of the belief that Abraham Lincoln was about to split the Nation even though he had no intention too. And this led to a rising fear of a Civil war occurring in America.
for the most part, historians view Andrew Johnson as the worst possible person to have served as President at the end of the American Civil War. Because of his gross incompetence in federal office and his incredible miscalculation of the extent of public support for his policies, Johnson is judged as a great failure in making a satisfying and just peace. He is viewed to have been a rigid, dictatorial racist who was unable to compromise or to accept a political reality at odds with his own ideas. Instead of forging a compromise between Radical Republicans and moderates, his actions united the opposition against him. His bullheaded opposition to the Freedmen's Bureau Bill, the Civil Rights Act of 1866, and the Fourteenth Amendment eliminated all hope of using presidential authority to affect further compromises favorable to his position. In the end, Johnson did more to extend the period of national strife than he did to heal the wounds of war.
Most importantly, Johnson's strong commitment to obstructing political and civil rights for blacks is principally responsible for the failure of Reconstruction to solve the race problem in the South and perhaps in America as well. Johnson's decision to support the return of the prewar social and economic system—except for slavery—cut short any hope of a redistribution of land to the freed people or a more far-reaching reform program in the South.
Historians naturally wonder what might have happened had Lincoln, a genius at political compromise and perhaps the most effective leader to ever serve as President, lived. Would African Americans have obtained more effective guarantees of their civil rights? Would Lincoln have better completed what one historian calls the "unfinished revolution" in racial justice and equality begun by the Civil War? Almost all historians believe that the outcome would have been far different under Lincoln's leadership.
Among historians, supporters of Johnson are few in recent years. However, from the 1870s to around the time of World War II, Johnson enjoyed high regard as a strong-willed President who took the courageous high ground in challenging Congress's unconstitutional usurpation of presidential authority. In this view, much out of vogue today, Johnson is seen to have been motivated by a strict constructionist interpretation of the Constitution and by a firm belief in the separation of powers. This perspective reflected a generation of historians who were critical of Republican policy and skeptical of the viability of racial equality as a national policy. Even here, however, apologists for Johnson acknowledge his inability to effectively deal with congressional challenges due to his personal limitations as a leader.
Answer: The world war 2 severely disrupted Europe's economies and helped set the stage for the Great Depression of the 1930s. , The Times Atlas to the Second World War . involvement in the conflict, wartime diplomacy, military strategy, and the war's economic and social implications. The question of how Japan was able to carry out its successful surprise attack on Pearl Harbor is thoroughly examined in Gordon W. The war's impact on the homefront is analyzed in William L. The most visible change involved the appearance of large numbers of women in uniform, as more than 250,000 women joined the WACs, the Army Nurses Corps, the WAVES, and the Navy Nurses Corps.
The war also challenged the conventional image of female behavior, as «Rosie the Riveter» became the popular symbol of women who worked in defense industries. Wartime transformations in women's lives are examined in Susan M. Roberts, which claimed without supporting evidence that the Japanese had received support from some Japanese Americans, helped to create a climate of opinion that led to internment. World War II marked the dawn of the atomic age. The development of nuclear weapons is thoroughly examined in Richard Rhodes, The Making of the Atomic Bomb .
The decision to drop two atomic bombs on Japan remains one of the most controversial decisions in military history.
Explanation: