1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Reika [66]
2 years ago
12

What Would A Nonviolent "social order" be based on

History
2 answers:
sergey [27]2 years ago
8 0

Ahh power, lowest slaves, middle merchants, etc... you know how it goes

Tema [17]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

It would be based on a set of norms, institutions and customs that regulate the lives of individuals in their legal, social and moral relations to each other and between them and the government at any time in a politically organized and policed ​​society

Explanation:

A nonviolent social order is formed by patterns of reciprocity and affinity. Their maintenance is guaranteed through the moral coercion that individuals obey. Every society exercises control over its members. This control is a reciprocal exchange between beliefs and values ​​with what is desirable. This manifests itself in the form of rituals, rites, routines and socialization processes.

You might be interested in
When did school children first recite the pledge of allegiance?
anastassius [24]

Answer:

1954

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Directions: Answer the following question in 3-5 complete sentences.
lozanna [386]
I think none of them were great honestly. They should not have been accepted
5 0
2 years ago
Help fast!!!
kifflom [539]

The Guantánamo detention center is a high security prison located in the Naval Base of Guantánamo Bay, located on the island of Cuba. It is an American property. Since 2002, US authorities have used it as a detention center for detainees accused of terrorism, most of them detained in Afghanistan during the invasion of this country, which followed the attacks of September 11, 2001.

The United States considers them "illegal enemy combatants" - most of them are accused of belonging to the Taliban or Al Qaeda, and not prisoners of war, so it understands that they do not have to apply the Geneva Convention and, therefore, that they can to hold them indefinitely without trial and without the right to representation of a lawyer, something that has been criticized by governments and human rights organizations around the world. The United States later admitted that, except for the members of Al Qaeda, the rest of the prisoners did. it would be protected by international conventions. Some jurists consider that the situation is in a "legal vacuum".

The first judicial decision was made on July 31, 2002. The federal judge of Columbia, Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, determined that the US legal system lacked jurisdiction over persons held at Guantánamo. This ruling was ratified in March 2003 by another federal judge. In June 2004, the United States Supreme Court ruled that "the United States courts have the jurisdiction required to dispute the legality of the detention of foreign nationals captured abroad in hostile and incarcerated activities in Guantanamo Bay" and He ruled that three prisoners who had invoked their right to be tried could take their case before civil courts. However, the majority of federal judges, in whose hands is how to apply the doctrine marked by the Supreme, seconded the thesis of the Administration that It is possible to retain the "foreign combatants" indefinitely, without bringing charges against them or putting them on trial. In 2006, the Supreme Court again attacked the Pentagon's strategy, stating that organizing military tribunals for foreign prisoners of war "violates the Code of Military Justice and the Geneva Convention", and that, moreover, it is not included in any rules. The Congress, with a Republican majority at that time, reacted by passing a law that expressly covers these military courts.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did some isolationists feel that there was no need for Americans to feel threatened by
satela [25.4K]

Most isolationists felt that there was no need for americans to feel threatened by developments in Europe and Asia because the vast pacific and atlantic oceans insulated the country from troubles in those regions, and the United States had formed friendly alliances with all the other nations in the Western hemisphere.

5 0
3 years ago
Which of these would only be covered in the Florida Constitution?
ki77a [65]

Answer:

education

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain the greater democracy during the progressive era
    7·1 answer
  • The seating arrangement on this southern bus reflects changes started by the ruling in
    15·2 answers
  • True or False: During the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, immigrants from predominantly Catholic countries faced open
    10·2 answers
  • What region became a crossroads where farmers, traders, and invaders settled, traded, and exchanged ideas
    13·1 answer
  • What events helped build New England's textile industry?
    13·1 answer
  • do you think a country is better off under communism or under a ruthless or corrupt leader who holds democratic elections?
    7·1 answer
  • Which new concept did the Song dynasty introduce to Japan and Korea?
    11·2 answers
  • Mmediately after World War I, how were conditions in Japan different from conditions in Germany?
    13·1 answer
  • Articles 2 of the constitution created which branch of government?
    13·1 answer
  • HELP PLS ITS TIMED
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!