Answer:
Father Flynn argues that Sister Aloysius has been “out to get him” for a long time. In an effort to defend his innocence, the priest mentions that Sister James believes that the accusations are false. Father Flynn grows increasingly aggravated, and he demands that Sister Aloysius provide him with concrete evidence that supports the allegations brought against him. After she replies that she saw the priest grab another student’s wrist, Father Flynn responds that he will have Sister Aloysius removed from her position at the school.
The humps for sure because they look swag
Answer and Explanation:
In "Flowers for Algernon," the main character is Charlie Gordon, a man who undergoes surgery to improve his intelligence. Before the procedure, Charlie's I.Q. was 68. At a certain point in the story, three different doctors try to explain to Charlie what I.Q. is, but they have different opinions on the matter.
<u>Dr. Nemur says the I.Q. of a person shows how smart that person is. Dr. Strauss, on the other hand, claims that Dr. Nemur is wrong, and that an I.Q. shows how smart a person can get. That it is like the numbers written on a measuring cup - we still need to fill the cup with something. Confused, Charlie talks to Dr. Burt, who says the other two doctors could be wrong. According to Burt, I.Q. can measure several different things, including things a person has already learned, but it is not a good measure for intelligence.</u>
Yes, I think Clinton's speech was effective in showing support for the American people during this tragedy because his tone reflect the pain he felet about the feelings of the people that lost loved ones to the tragedy.
The use of language and parallelism help advance his purpose because he was able to tell about the feeling of a particular women through her letter about the death of her husband and she implores that Americans should “search for justice.” and not express anger.
<h3>What is Parallelism?</h3>
Parallelism serves as the literary term that described the similar words, phrases, sentence structure, as well as grammatical elements to emphasize similar ideas in a sentence.
Learn more about Clinton's speech at:
brainly.com/question/17647378
#SPJ1
I would say an unreliable narrator because that kind of narrator is the best at keeping secrets from the reader. If that's not an option, then a restricted narrator because they only know a limited amount of information.