Well first if we needed to get more and more meat by the years that means we would have to breed and kill more cows,chickens,pigs,sheep basic farm animals that are eaten more than others and for vegetables and fruits we would have to give up space for trees and bushes.
Answer: The country with the least casualties was (c) the Ottoman Empire.
The country with the highest casualty rate was (b) Austria-Hungary.
Explanation: The Ottoman Empire had the fewest casualties, as per the chart.
The casualty rate of Austria-Hungary was close to 89.9% of their total force, far greater than the casualty rate of Germany and the Ottoman Empire.
<em>Answer:</em>
<em>By the end of the Second World War, the United States had come to consider the Middle East region as "the most strategically important area of the world." ... For that reason, it was not until around the period of World War II that America became directly involved in the Middle East region.</em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>NATO's strategic planning cannot count upon use of Middle Eastern oil in another war and Western Europe--with United States help-- can probably fight without it. ... The other factors that give the Middle East its vast importance are too well known to need elaboration. The area is a highly important communications hub.</em>
<span>a recession and higher unemployment</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is D. Sending military support to certain countries to fight the spread of Communism best displays the ideas stated in the Eisenhower Doctrine.
Explanation:
The Eisenhower Doctrine was the military doctrine of the United States from 1953 to 1962. This extremely rigid nuclear doctrine had a simple principle: any attack on a NATO member country by the USSR would expose it to massive nuclear reprisals, without notice and without restraint.
Formulated at the beginning of the 1950s, the doctrine was framed within the context of the United States' superiority in nuclear weapons such that its use may appear to present a relatively limited risk for the United States, in view of the very significant potential destruction which would result in the USSR.
It also responded to Eisenhower's will for a strict orthodoxy in budgetary matters, in particular through a severe limitation of conventional armaments budgets made possible by the development, for a comparatively modest cost, of nuclear weapons.