The Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)<span> required (for the first time) that someone accused of a crime be </span>informed<span> of his or her constitutional rights prior to interrogation. This protected the rights of the accused, or the defendant, in two new ways: 1) It educated the person about relevant constitutional rights; and 2) It inhibited law enforcement officials from infringing those rights by applying the Exclusionary Rule to any testimony/incriminating statements the defendant made unless he intentionally waived his rights. </span>
<span>The Exclusionary Rule prohibits evidence or testimony obtained illegally or in violation of the constitution from being used against the defendant in court. </span>
<span>The </span>Miranda<span> ruling has been revised somewhat by subsequent Supreme Court decisions. On June 1, 2010, the Roberts' Court released the opinion for </span>Berghuis v. Thompkins,<span> 08-1470 (2010), which held a defendant must </span>invoke<span> his right to remain silent (by stating he wants to remain silent), rather than </span>waive<span>it (by explicitly agreeing to answer questions before interrogation). </span>
Answer:
Explanation:
Jackson wanted to move them from america complete he made the trail of tears which pushed them into rez and as Americans moved west So did native americans it was a never ending battle and the ameircans came through from raiding the native american reservations which still happens today.
The interest group that voiced opinions on ratifying the constitution and establishing a more powerful central government was known as the Federalists and Anti-Federalists.
<h3>Who are the Federalists and Anti-Federalists?</h3>
A conflict arose over ratification, with the Federalists supporting a strong union and the Constitution's adoption and the Anti-Federalists opposing the establishment of a powerful national government and rejecting ratification.
In contrast to the Anti-Federalists, who opposed the ratification of the U.S. Constitution in 1787, the Federalists stood for those who favored the establishment of a more powerful federal government.
Because they believed that state constitutions already protected individual rights, the Anti-Federalists opposed a bill of rights in the Constitution.
In exchange for their approval, the Federalists agreed to include the Bill of Rights.
To ensure that the rights would not be revoked by the new federal government, the Anti-Federalists insisted that a bill of rights be included in the Constitution.
To learn more about Anti-Federalists, visit:
brainly.com/question/28622723
#SPJ1
The correct answer should be reward. In order to reward buyers for buying, you put the prices lower even though in reality you could be making the same mount of money. You thus decide to earn less money but you reward your buyers for being loyal or you get them to buy.
