<span>Historians need to be as accurate and honest </span>as possible in terms of telling the story of the
past. <span>
<span>Sifting through lots of information requires patience
so I would not pick impatience.
</span></span>
<span>While all humans have some bias, all the social
sciences as sciences strive to minimize bias. So I could not choose bias as a
character trait important for historians. </span>
The articles gave the government no separation of powers. The government was too weak, the Articles left much of the power to the states (if I remember correctly, states basically went by their own state constitution). Congress didn't have the power to tax. To change the Articles, it had to be decided unanimously by all states. Also, 9 out of the 13 states had to approve any major law before it was passed and Congress couldn't regulate commerce. There was no president to lead, no established court system, and every state had only one vote in congress.
Basically, the articles created no separate executive department to carry out and enforce the acts of Congress and no national court system to interpret the meaning of laws.
After Roosevelt failed to get the Republican nomination, he called his own convention and created a new Progressive Party, nicknamed the Bull Moose Party This name came into existence when reporters suggested that Roosevelt was no longer fit for the officeand he replied "I'm as fit as a bull moose
