Answer:
Hi Lisa, How are you? My family and I were (be) on holiday in Italy last month. We __went(go) there by plane – we did not take_____ (not take) the train. My sister and I swam_(swim) in the sea every day. We ___visited__(visit) some museums too. In the evenings, we __didn't stay__ (not stay) in our hotel. We had (have) dinner in small Italian restaurants. The food was_ (be) fantastic. See you soon. Matt
Explanation:
The above informal letter was written by Matt to Lisa. It described some events that took place the previous month. For this reason, the verb form used is past simple. It is the form of the verb that reports past events without indicating the duration of the event.
Usually, the rule of thumb indicates the following:
1- Introduction
You say what you are trying to do with your text and how you are trying to accomplish it.
2- Body [1]
You introduce your topic and your argument [thesis] and introduce supporting detail.
3- Body [2]
You elaborate on the supporting detail.
4- Body [3]
You state what your opposing party believes regarding your argument, and refute it.
5- Conclusion
You reflect on what you have stated to accomplish the objective mentioned in the introduction, and how you have accomplished it.
The reason why you should not address a counterargument before/after where is suggested is because it's counterproductive to the purpose of the segments in the structure. If you do it in the second paragraph of your body, you didn't allow yourself space to support your thesis. Similarly, the introduction and conclusion paragraphs are not there for you to address anything, so doing so would be incoherent.
legalization for approving weed in all states and that they make Santa clause a real thing and last that they should reduce collage cost.
Answer:
Chicago Bulls
Explanation:
Based on the passage, the Chicago Bulls won the match because of several reasons.
First, the excerpt says "...should HAVE BEEN the game the Chicago Bulls lost" because their star player Michael Jordan was hospitalised because of a suspected stomach flu and he was dehydrated and missed two days of practice meaning that because of the fact that the Chicago Bulls did not have their star man operating optimally, they were supposed to lose.
The next line goes ahead to say that, "It SHOULD (in fact) HAVE marked the Utah's Jazz's first NBA Championship
win" meaning that because of the advantage of Chicago Bulls not having their star player at a hundred percent, Utah Jazz were slight favorites to win and should have in fact won, but apparently they didn't.
Finally, the tenses used in the passage indicate strongly that Utah Jazz failed to capitalise on the slight advantage they had and Chicago Bulls won the game.
