The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to attach the options for this question. However, trying to help you we can comment on the following.
Tanner and Jordyn were having a conflict on how to divide a potential client list. Both of them really care about the issue and are willing to spend a lot of time sorting out their disagreement. They have already tried to use the Compromise style but there is only a set number of clients so they recognize each will have to concede a little bit for the sake of harmony and use Collaborative style instead.
Here, we are talking about conflict management styles. According to experts, there are five management styles to solve conflicts in the organization. These are the Accommodating style, the Avoiding style, the Compromise style, the competing style, and the collaboration style.
That is why under this situation, Tanner and Jordyn are trying to resolve their conflict in a civilized way knowing that there is a limited number of clients.
Answer:
Yes, They can.
Explanation:
The fourth amendment protected every citizens in united states from unreasonable searches and seizures. This means that if police want to search for evidence from private property, the search need to be conducted with a warrant.
But, in the case above, police was not the one that took the evidence. It was another individual who later gave the evidence to the police.
So technically, the police wasn't conducting any search that protected by the fourth amendment.
Answer:
<em>1. Long-term plan</em>
<em>2.</em>
<em>3. Criminal laws regulate how people are treated after being arrested, while civil laws deal with the treatment of free civilians.</em>
<em>4. </em>
<em>5. Property law</em>
<em></em>
<em></em>
Explanation:
