The Equal Rights Amendment
The Equal Rights Amendment, formulated as early as 1923 by the National Women's Party, proposed that "e<span>quality of rights under the law shall not be abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex." When feminist groups in the 1960s and 1970s pushed for Congress to propose this as an amendment to the Constitution, conservatives such as Schlafly opposed it. The House of Representatives gave its approval in 1970; the Senate did so in 1972. The next step was ratification by the states. But the campaign against the amendment led by Schlafly contributed to its demise, failing to achieve ratification. A key point Schlafly focused on was that women would then be subject to military draft and military combat service in the same way as men, and this became the key issue regarding the defeat of the Equal Rights Amendment.</span>
The correct answer is Open Boarders
Explanation:
In a debate, there are two or more positions about a specific situation or issue. Additionally, each of these positions is supported by participants using arguments that can include facts, statistics, citations, among others. In the case of the immigration debate, one of the sides or positions is that immigrants should not be restricted from entering the country and therefore immigration should be considered as negative. Supporters of this side propose migration can help the economy of the country, promotes inequality, and can reunite families. Therefore, the opinion the government should promote family reunification as part of immigration is part of the Open Borders side that promotes reducing or ending for immigrants.
The correct answer should be <span>raise security and protect citizens against terrorists.
The patriot act, for example, made it possible to initiate wars if there is suspicion that foreign governments are hiding terrorists. </span>
