1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mariarad [96]
4 years ago
8

Would the South have been more successful with Reconstruction or without Reconstruction?

History
2 answers:
Salsk061 [2.6K]4 years ago
8 0
Without reconstruction they would have had more money for ammunition’s and their soldiers
OverLord2011 [107]4 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Without Reconstruction

Explanation:

They have poor background.

You might be interested in
Location B is ______________.
Korvikt [17]
The answer is C the Mediterranean Sea
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Name an influencial philosopher in the european dark ages.
Leya [2.2K]
<span>Thomas Aquinas who attempted to present a rational argument for god's existence two of which being the clockmakers argument and  the first causer argument</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Which conclusion can be drawn about the second punic war from the information in the map
katrin2010 [14]

Answer:

The Second Punic War was fought between the Romans and the Carthaginians between 218 and 201 BC. The Romans then went on to a several-year war of wear and tear, gradually destroying or neutralizing the allies and main colonies of Carthage, and finally, under the leadership of Publius Cornelius Scipionus Africano, they won the Battle of Zama. This war definitely decided the struggle of both cities for dominance in the Mediterranean in favor of Rome.  

Due to the complete destruction of Carthage in the Third Punic War in 146 BC and the long-term hegemony of the Roman Empire in the Mediterranean, no historical sources have been preserved describing the course of the war and its background from a Carthaginian or truly neutral point of view. Historians can therefore rely only on the works of Greek and Roman ancient authors and must therefore interpret them very carefully.

3 0
3 years ago
Think about how the author structured the account you just read, then answer the question.
weeeeeb [17]

Answer:

The author uses sequencing to trace the events of the deportation of Armenians from Afiun Kara Hissar in the order that she witnessed them.

Explanation:

I got it wrong :(

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the period leading up to World War 1 how did nationalism unite or divide citizens
nignag [31]

Answer:

Nationalism helped unite citizens within a certain group(such as common culture or history). However, it can also cause intense competition between nations. Many ethnic groups part of the Ottoman empire wanted to become independent and were successful going about these ways, which divided them. ‍

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The economic exploitation of the far west after the civil war relied heavily on
    11·1 answer
  • Why does south america have a large portuguese-speaking population?
    8·1 answer
  • For whom and to what extent was the American West a land of opportunity from 1865 to 1900?
    14·1 answer
  • Why did president nixon oppose the extensions of the voting rights act
    11·1 answer
  • What two men from the Enlightenment era applied reason to government?
    12·1 answer
  • Which statement describes a major advantage of a confederal system of government over a unitary system
    6·2 answers
  • After returning to Florence what sculpture did Michelangelo create
    10·2 answers
  • Which european country had controlled indochina but was forced out by 1954?
    9·1 answer
  • How did Muslim philosopher follow the example of Greek scholars
    8·1 answer
  • "Worse than Slavery" Masked, armed, and supplied with horses and money... they ride over the country at midnight, and perpetrate
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!