Answer: the correct anwer is A. A suit seeking to assert the interest of state citizens in retaining diplomatic relations with a foreign nation.
Explanation:
Under the Article III, section 2, the United States Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and in which the state is a party. In option A, the state is trying to act in parents patriae which is to act as representative of its citizens thereby asserting their interests that is to say that the state is not a party in the case. In all other case the state is a party and has incumbency in the matter.
Answer:
Mexican Texas
Explanation:
Mexican Texas is a term that described a certain part of a geographical area in the first Republic of Mexico around the year 1821 to 1836. During this period due to differences in socio-political ideologies, Mexican Texas "ask for separate statehood within Mexico"
Also, due to the tremendous native population of Mexican Texas settlers from America, they "ask for immigration from the U.S."
In 1833, due to the political situation of the region, they give "land for public schools"
Hence, in this case, a good title for this description is "MEXICAN TEXAS"
Answer:
Negation = Pn ¬q
Contrapositive = ¬q = ¬p
Converse = q=p
Inverse = ¬p = ¬q
Explanation:
If today is new year's, then tomorrow is January.
Let P = If today is new year's eve
q = tomorrow is January
Negation of q = ¬q
The statement is represented as P=q
Negation ; today is new year's eve (p), then tomorrow is not January (¬q)
Negation = Pn ¬q
Contrapositive ; If tomorrow is not January (¬q), then today is not new year's eve(¬p)
¬q = ¬p
Converse ; If tomorrow is January, then today is new year's eve i.e if q then p
= q=p
Inverse ; if today is not new year's eve, then tomorrow is not January
if not p, then not q ; ¬p = ¬q
