Answer:
mobilizers
Explanation:
The group of people being described are known as Professional political mobilizers. These are individuals whose professional job is to go and talk to as many people as possible in order to talk and persuade them to vote for the political party they work for or believe in. They do this by providing information on the political party and telling them about the promises that the party is making for the community.
Answer:b. actus reus.
Explanation:
Actus reus:
Actus reus is derived from Latin word which refers to a criminal act.
Criminal acts are considered based whether the crime commited was physical (actus reus) or it was based on mental instability (mens tea).
Actus reus is when someone knowingly commit an act that is prohibited in a criminal law , a person intentional makes a move that will harm another person; this can be a physical assault or murder.
Not doing something that can help someone in danger which is known as omission is also under actus reus.
However if the criminal act that a person committed was involuntary it doesn't fall under actus reus like an action committed when someone may have been asleep.
Rashaad knowingly and voluntarily short his wife and friend whilst he was in his right state of mind and also being well aware that this physical action in which he pulled a trigger will harm his wife and friend.
False. Social movements have the ability to share their views on different platforms, gaining attention and awareness
A scientific theory is a statement based on observation and
experiment. If continued observation and experiment support the
statement, it may become widely accepted. A theory that has been
widely accepted is used to explain and predict natural phenomena.
Answer:
They attribute this to power struggles within the lab hierarchy.
Explanation:
In the scientific areas, research is usually carried out, and the scientists in charge of these studies that have the best reviews usually obtain better benefits than the researchers who are unnoticed. Therefore, it is essential to achieve good research results, although this often contributes to a power struggle between collaborators.
In laboratories, this struggle of power can be observed within the scientific hierarchy; this occurs among scientists with more experience, with those who have more time in the area, those who obtain better results, and those who want to achieve better benefits.
For example, in the case of anthropologists, Jona Salk observed that in some research he gave more importance to some results than others, he tried to show his power in the laboratory hierarchy and benefit some scientists.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
