Answer:
It all began when the Romans overthrew their Etruscan conquerors in 509 B.C.E. Centered north of Rome, the Etruscans had ruled over the Romans for hundreds of years. Once free, the Romans established a republic, a government in which citizens elected representatives to rule on their behalf.
Then the Great Roman Empire started its supports in its historic construction.
Source:
https://www.ushistory.org/civ/6a.asp
Answer:
separate themselves from those who were unlike them
Explanation:
As nationalism emerged in kingdoms and other regions of the world, where previously the notion of being a group with a common past, culture and history, and the shared language similarities did not exist before.
A conscience of sharing this heritage make them different to other groups that promoted other set of values.
Nationalism was driven often by romantic feelings, or revolutionary ideals, like the wave that schocked European continent with Napoleon Bonaparte.
The desire of people to have a shared identity often led to social movements that wanted to form their own nation-state, also leading to wars of Independence: (For example Serbia, and Bosnia in the Austro-Hungarian Empire). Poland sought always independence from the Russian and German oppresors (embracing the so called Romantic -Nationalism).
Answer: Hostile
Explanation:
The American Indians did not get along with them at all. Scalping was one of the most things they would do while they traveled on the trail.
Answer: The answer is D. Without proof, journalists blamed Spain for the sinking of the ship.
Explanation:
Yellow Journalism is overexaggerated something and the journalists exaggerated the sinking of the ship which later lead to the war.
I am going to assume here you are referring to the 'Scramble of Africa' that happened in the second half of the 19th century, as the European power did not really control the African regions before then.
The methods contexts did differ per colonising power and colonised region, but it boils down to the following factors:
- superior firepower, equipment and recourses; having better guns, armour, communication technology, and supply routes, made the Europeans a formidable enemy that the various tribes simply could not counter.
- co-opting the local elites; a tried and tested method for centuries, this has always been the way smart conquerers could maintain control over a region with minimal fuss and expenditur.
<span>- divide and conquer; conflict between the many tribes of Africa has been a constant for centuries in the continent. The Europeans could easily manipulate the various tribes against each other to prevent a unified resistance from rising up. </span>
<span>- a willingness to use extreme forms of terror; the Europeans might have been all high and mighty back home about their Enlightment and democracy, but in Africa they were more than willing to use forms of terror that would make most contemporary dictators feel a little uneasy. Case in point, the widespread killing and mutilation when quotas were not met in king Leopold II's Congo.</span>