Paleontologists are still debating about whether modern behavior, language, and art appeared more recently in Europe, about 50,0
00 years ago or further back, based on findings such as the tools and artifacts found at the Blombos cave. What do you think? Do you think the artifacts show higher level thinking, or just a form of art? Explain your answer.
If you're doing this on edg, then you'll almost alwats get a 0% even if you typed it. But here's my answer
Explanation:
I believe it shows both higher level thinking as well as a form of art. The Blombos caves shows ancient artifacts showing interlectual structure of improvement by adapting the form of art. The caves preserved the art showing that they have learned how to create triangular art by carving the stone(similar to the woodcut technique) which would be widdled with a sharp object such as a knife, bones, or a sharp stone. As for the artifacts, the cave walls were painted(proof of art) showing ancient animals and how they hunted by creating weapons(also artifacts). So as you might see, the Blombos caves show artifacts of a higher thinking as well as a form of art.
The way in which Leonardo da Vinci looked at machines different from the way most artists and craftsmen of his time looked at them is that, h<span>e felt that he could invent and innovate machines. On the other hand, most craftsmen thought only to repair and build machines. Hope this answer helps.</span>
