Answer:
The answers to the two questions are detailed in the explanation;
Explanation:
1.In this first case, David Wallace may possibly win, since a single creditor as a witness that due to the negligence of the director of the company did not receive his payment is not enough evidence for a lawsuit.
There should be more creditors who are dissatisfied with this situation, and it must also be analyzed what were the real causes that led to the company not having made the corresponding payment to this creditor.
2.In this second situation, the company Dunder Company may possibly win, since the corporation breached a previously established contract, this establishes the basis for a lawsuit in which Papers Import must possibly comply with the provisions of the contract or compensate the damages caused to the Dunder Company.
When businesses raise the price of a needed product or service after a natural disaster, this is known as price gouging. Price gouging is something that businesses do after a natural disaster when they know consumers are going to need a specific product or service so they raise the price because they know people are going to buy it anyways. An example of this is when they raise gas prices after a natural disaster, knowing people still need gas.
Answer:
d. a $10,000 decrease.
Explanation:
The computation of the impact on the income is given below:
In case of making the product
= Direct material + direct labor + variable manufacturing overhead + rented
= $100,000 + $160,000 + $60,000 + $10,000
= $330,000
And, in case of buying the product
= 20,000 × $17
= $340,000
So there is a decrease of $10,000
