<span>C. France. </span><span>France had held colonial claims in Vietnam and other neighboring countries, in what was called French Indochina, since the 1880s. During World War II, when Japan was taking control of territories in Asia, the Japanese tolerated the French remaining present in their Indochina territories. Following the war, France sought to retain and reassert its colonial control over the region, but the First Indochina War (beginning in 1946) was Vietnam's effort to establish its independence of French control.</span>
That is very nice. Taught me more than Dora ever could :O
French expansion into the Ohio river valley lead to conflict.
Answer:
C: people can spread hatred as long as it is factually true.
Explanation:
You have a problem here. The first amendment prohibits saying or writing something that cause violence to erupt.
The first amendment also protects us from being the victims of libelous speech. I guess that means that hate speech is permitted as long as it is factually true. In Canada, hate speech has been made so that the Government can stop it. But it does not seem to be the same in the United States. So this one, I suppose should be in the group below.
I don't know how you choose between these two. All you can do is eliminate the two that are true and which the Federal Government cannot enforce.
1. Forcing people to belong to the same religion.
2. Burning flags
Everyone has their own opinions. It's one of the things that make us, as humans, great. However due to the fact that we have the right to have an opinion it also means that there will almost certainly be someone who disagrees. This means that even a monument that appeals to the majority of people will always have that group that disagrees with it. For example Holocaust monuments are accepted worldwide. We, as a planet, know that the Holocaust was a terrible event. However, even in today's world, there are those that disagree and find these monuments unacceptable. It may seem bizarre but it is something that happens everyday.
