Choose the best answer:
Review the argument.
Claim #1: David likes peanut butter.
Claim #2: Some people who like peanut butter are jk word.
Conclusion: David is a jk word.
Which best identifies an error in the relevance of this argument?
A preference for or against peanut butter is not a valid way to evaluate an individual's personality.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
If you feel bad about bullying them and you really want to get it off your chest, you SHOULD contact them through Instagram and let them know that you're genuinely sorry for whatever you did. If you're getting bullied, you need to tell your principal and your guardian, and if you want, you can speak up to the bully. Never try to fight the bully, it can end with you or others getting hurt or getting in trouble which isn't good.
Explanation:
Answer:
Caesars
Explanation:
it is when the poem breaks in a verse where on a phrase and end another phrase begins
Answer:
The line from the excerpt that is an example of objective language is "In the course of the construction of the Bridge a number of lives have been lost."
Explanation:
The sentence selected includes real and reliable data about a fact, this is one of the main characteristics of the sentences than use objective language, even when there are moments in the rest of the excerpt that the information contains a point of view or perspective coming from the writer it is not the case of this sentence which makes it clear direct and objective.
