It cant be "Egyptian hieroglyphs provide information about the country’s history, medicine, science, and laws." Because its his claim and not a type of counterclaim.
It cant be "The Rosetta Stone allowed people to read ancient Egyptian writing." Because it is also the authors claim and not a counter.
It can't be "Learning how to read hieroglyphs is the best way to understand the ancient culture of the Egyptians." Because he directly explains it along with all the above answers.
It has to be "Digging up ancient Egyptian tombs teaches us more about the way people lived than hieroglyphs do." Because it is directly opposing the authors claim by saying that it teaches us more than hieroglyphs do.
