All categories

3 years ago

Help! :)

English

2 answers:

azamat3 years ago

7 0

The answer for the first question is A) Scientists have lots of evidence to explain why dragons don't exist.

Reason: The reason why this answer is right is because scientists explained that "They laughed at the idea of dragons breathing fire", that it would be impossible for the dragons to fly up because they were too big (fat).

The answer for the second question is C) I have always wondered if dragons existed, and I hope they did.

Reason: She was wondering if the dragons ever existed because of the fact that scientists were judging that there was no such thing as dragons, while other people think that there is such things as dragons (like for instance, they appeared in legal papers, the Bible, even the Chinese calender.

Hope this helped!

Plz mark brainliest!

swat323 years ago

6 0

1. The main idea would be "Scientists have lots of evidence to explain why dragons don't exist."

Emphasized by the evidence and word choice related to scientific evidence

2. The main idea would be "I have always wondered if dragons existed, and I hope they did."

Displayed through the author's nature of questioning and evaluating different kinds of evidence and ideas.

You might be interested in

How can Fire and Ice destroy the world? *I need very short Answer for this*

liraira [26]

well, simultaneously i say, they cannot do much since fire melts ice and ice, well it cools down the heat from the fire.

but lets say only fire destroys the world, i say we would die from its burns or the heat.

for ice, i say we would freeze in the cold (hypothermia)

8 0

3 years ago

Mashcka [7]

He was delayed. D is the answer

7 0

3 years ago

Some like to walk around the edge of the rock on the ground. Others climb to the top, though some people do not think they shoul

devlian [24]

Answer:

Just need points but try c

Explanation:

5 0

4 years ago

- Denouement

lyudmila [28]

Exposition => D) We learn that the woman died after developing a cough. In the exposition, we still don't know where she went and how she died.
Rising action => B) The main character looks for his lover's tombstone. His grief is transformed into anguish because he can't find where she was buried.
Falling action => C) The main character falls unconscious on the grave. After the climax, when his beloved rises from her grave with the others and reveals to him that she had actually gone out to cheat on him, the falling action happens when he is incapable of dealing with the truth and falls unconscious. The conflict (her premature death) is thus resolved.
Denouement => A) We are left to wonder what was real and what was a dream. This is a poetic diminuendo that has the purpose of problematizing the whole story: we know that we're dealing with an unreliable narrator, who is deeply disturbed by his dramatic love story, but also incapable of owning his problems.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the passive of she ate rice?

svetlana [45]

Answer:

Rice was eaten by her

Explanation:

we know that passive structure is

Object +be verb + verb in past participle + subject + by......

in this sentence,

she => subject

ate => verb

rice => object

Lets create the sentence now

Rice was eaten by her

hope this helps

brainliest appreciated

good luck! have a nice day

8 0

3 years ago