1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zhuklara [117]
3 years ago
5

Which of the following best explains how a theocracy and an absolute monarchy are different ?

History
1 answer:
never [62]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: A theocracy uses religious beliefs as a basis for laws, where as an absolute monarchy may have non-religious laws.

Explanation: Apex

You might be interested in
Which of the following is an example of how the United States countered Soviet influence in Asia and Africa
Klio2033 [76]
C would be correct because of the Marshal plan, Truman doctrine, Eisenhower doctrine etc                                   
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A problem for the national government under the articles of confederation was that apex
zvonat [6]
No provisions were made for an executive branch to enforce the laws nor for a national court system to interpret them. A legislative Congress was the sole organ of the national government, but it had no power to force the states to do anything against their will.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Northern and southern states comprised on the slave trade by?
Zolol [24]

agreeing to continue the slave trade indefinitely

agreeing not to end the slave trade for at least 20 years

agreeing to end the slave trade immediately

agreeing to continue the slave trade for a maximum of 50 years

6 0
2 years ago
What evidence does the author provide to support the statement, "Pennsylvania created the most radical state constitution of the
Ilya [14]

Hello. You forgot to add the text to which this question refers. The text is:

Pennsylvania created the most radical state constitution of the period. Following the idea of popular rule to its logical conclusion, Pennsylvania created a state government with several distinctive features. First, the Pennsylvania constitution of 1776 abolished property requirements for voting as well as for holding office. If you were an adult man who paid taxes, then you were allowed to vote or even to run for office. This was a dramatic expansion of who was considered a political person, but other aspects of the new state government were even more radical. Pennsylvania also became a "unicameral" government where the legislature only had one body. Furthermore, the office of the governor was entirely eliminated. Radicals in Pennsylvania observed that the governor was really just like a small-scale king and that an upper legislative body (like the House of Lords in Parliament) was supposed to represent wealthy men and aristocrats. Rather than continue those forms of government, the Pennsylvania constitution decided that "the people" could rule most effectively through a single body with complete legislative power.

Answer:

The Pennsylvania Constitution established a unicameral legislative body.

The Pennsylvania Constitution abolished property requirements for voting and holding elected office.

Explanation:

The text above shows how Pennsylvania created a constitution a totally different and radical constitution compared to other American states. This is because Pennsylvania, through its constitution, modified its entire political body, creating a more popular structure and accessible to all citizens. The main changes occurred in terms of who could vote and stand and how the state's legislative body would be established. In summary, these changes are:

  • The Pennsylvania Constitution established a unicameral legislative body.
  • The Pennsylvania Constitution abolished property requirements for voting and holding elected office.
5 0
3 years ago
How did Sen. Sumner almost start a war with England?
Cloud [144]

Answer:

Senator Charles Sumner, an abolitionist leader before the Civil War and a powerful foe of conciliation toward states that had seceded after the war, considered his field to be "in morals, not politics." He is best remembered for surviving an attack by Representative Preston Brooks in 1856 during which Brooks beat Sumner with a cane on the Senate floor. Brooks' attack was a sign of the increasing hostility between the North and South in the years leading up to the Civil War.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Phoenician culture is best remembered for the development of iron weapons. true or false?
    11·2 answers
  • How did great britain and the united states differ in their responses to the depression?
    11·1 answer
  • What is 15/16 minus 3/16
    6·2 answers
  • A second reason the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 angered Northerners was that it
    9·1 answer
  • Why did jean calvin believe that the entire congregation should sing psalms?
    9·1 answer
  • How did Christianity spread to the Slavic lands
    14·1 answer
  • Why do you think Moctezuma’s speech surprised Cortés?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following was NOT a goal of the Constitution, as written in the preamble?
    14·1 answer
  • I still need help!!!
    7·1 answer
  • Why did the Founders feel it was necessary and important to create the Bill of Rights?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!