Answer:
d. 5704.02
Explanation:
Nper = 30*12 = 360
Rate = 10%/12 = 0.008333
PV = 650,000
Using the MS Excel function:
Monthly payment = PMT(RATE, NPER, -PV)
Monthly payment = PMT(10%/12, 360, -650000)
Monthly payment = $5,704.02
Answer: (d.)The bakery faces a flat demand curve.
Explanation:
The bakery faces a flat demand curve because a firm in a perfectly competitive market is a price taker and the demand curve for a firm is equal to the price the supply curve is a part of Marginal cost above Average variable cost , so the supply curve is upward sloping
. The bakery is in the perfectly competitive market so it can earn positive, negative or zero economic profit in the short run and zero economic profit in the long run.
Answer:
The answers that apply are:
(B) The price for a hunting license is increased in an effort to reduce the number of hunters.
(C) A law is passed increasing the price of cigarettes in an effort to decrease secondhand smoke.
Explanation:
Hunting is a practice that governments are trying to control and decrease. So if government want to decrease the amount of people hunting they should increase the price of the licence.
Smoking is unhealthy, so the law increase the price for healthy reasons.
Answer:
c. producers
Explanation:
Since it is given in the question that the price elasticity of demand is relatively elastic but the price elastic of supply is relatively inelastic but if the excise tax is imposed on the goods so the greater burden of the tax would be on the producers as the supply is inelastic so the producers could not changed much but if we compare to the consumers, the consumer could change the demand more than before due to the elastic in demand.
So, the correct option is c.
Answer:
Its action would be optimal given an ordering cost of $28.31 per order
Explanation:
According to the given data we have the following:
economic order quantity, EOQ= 55 units
annual demand, D=235
holding cost per one unit per year, H=40%×$11=$4.4
ordering cost, S=?
In order to calculate the ordering cost we would have to use the following formula:
EOQ=√(<u>2×D×S)</u>
(H)
Hence, S=<u>(EOQ)∧2×H</u>
2×D
S=<u>(55)∧2×4.4</u>
2×235
S=<u>13,310</u>
470
S=$28.31
Its action would be optimal given an ordering cost of $28.31 per order