1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
almond37 [142]
3 years ago
13

Former President Bush's doctrine—stating that the United States would strike first against terrorists and their supportive state

s, to preempt rather than to react to attacks—elicited serious concerns that Congress would lose even more of its already declining power over foreign policy and the use of military power abroad. Such preemptive use of military power by the president would almost certainly violate the 1973 War Powers Resolution. How successful has the policy been? Should it be preserved or eliminated?
History
1 answer:
IRINA_888 [86]3 years ago
7 0

The policy of  preemptive striking has not been successful and has caused much tensions for the US

It must not be preserved.

Explanation:

The world has been moving away and away from two state conflict and now most of the conflicts in Antioch are internal and not external.

This is the case for the places such as the eons in the middle east that were invaded by Bush quite unnecessarily and then the US  had been stuck in the war for decades and may have caused more harm than good.

It has led for the distrust of international community for the US too.

The people simply do no trust the US for war any more and this has been  concern.

You might be interested in
All citizens are guaranteed certain protections under the U.S. Constitution. One of
Vitek1552 [10]
Freedom of speech i hope this helps?
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What type of border would likely have the most protection?
Ludmilka [50]
C because there normally is a national army whose first duty is to protect
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Answer to number 2 help
ArbitrLikvidat [17]
Parliamentary democracy, so answer choice d
6 0
3 years ago
What was the effect of anti-war protests on the Vietnam conflict?
VMariaS [17]
Massive gatherings of anti-war demonstrators helped bring attention to the public resentment of U.S. involvement in Vietnam. The confrontation seen above took place at the Pentagon in 1967. Despite the growing antiwar movement, a silent majority of Americans still supported the Vietnam effort.
7 0
3 years ago
Delegates from the Hartford convention threatened to secede from the United States
deff fn [24]
100% true, as an old timer i remember those days


3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • An astronaut leaves the International Space Station (ISS) on a tethered line. Although ISS and Earth exert gravitational force o
    12·1 answer
  • What year did the Ottoman Empire collapse?
    14·1 answer
  • Which statements describe ways that ivan iii increased his power or status as ruler of russia? choose all answers that are corre
    5·2 answers
  • In what ways did the Phoenicians influence later civilizations? Write your answer in bullet form
    15·2 answers
  • How did the monarchies of England and France affect their societies differently?
    13·2 answers
  • An indentured servant moving to the American colonies had to pay for room and board. eventually became an enslaved person. agree
    13·2 answers
  • The two men who led an expedition to explore the louisiana territory in 1804-1806
    12·1 answer
  • How the territory of Louisiana and Oregon became a territory of the United States​
    11·2 answers
  • What was Tin Pan Alley and why was it important?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following led to the St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!