Answer: The mandate system authorized a member nation of the League of Nations to govern a former German or Turkish colonial area after the conclusion of World War I.
Context/detail:
When World War I erupted, the Ottoman Empire sided with Germany as part of the "Central Powers." In the end, the Central Powers lost and the Turkish empire of the Ottomans ceased to exist as an empire. Turkey remained as a country, but it lost control over other territories that it had held before. Germany was stripped of its overseas colonial holdings.
The League of Nations created a system for governing former German and Ottoman territories, called "the mandate system." There were mandate territories for former German territories in Africa and Asia, as well for former Ottoman territories in the Middle East.
The former Turkish provinces of Syria, Iraq and Palestine in the Middle East were divided into a French mandate territory and British mandate territory. The British mandate rule over Palestine has much to do with the history of the development of the Arab-Israeli conflict.
Answer:
ONE way in which the Pueblo Revolts differed from the Cossack Revolts is:
While the Pueblo revolts had religious coloration, the Cossacks revolts were political.
Explanation:
The Pueblo Revolts occurred in 1680 and lasted for 12 years only. They were revolts against the forced conversion of Pueblo Indians to Christianity. On the other hand, the Cossack revolts were a series of military conflicts engineered by Cossacks against the various (Polish, Lithuanian, and Russian) states that tried to dominate them in their territories during the 16th, 17th, and 18th centuries. This implies that the Cossacks revolts were politically-inclined, while the Pueblo revolts were mainly religious.
The answer would be opium (a drug) to trade for tea because the British didn’t want to pay silver for it and had lead to the opium wars which China had lost.
