1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Semmy [17]
3 years ago
15

An advocate for limited government would most likely oppose the modern American bureaucracy for which reason?

History
2 answers:
Alik [6]3 years ago
5 0
I confirm, the answer is C for apex !!
Leona [35]3 years ago
3 0
I believe that the answer for this is option B. Since there is an advocate given for a limited government, this would most likely contradict the modern American bureaucracy for the reason that the shift of bureaucracy is too much that the federal power between the President to the Congress becomes imbalance.
You might be interested in
What happened to the barbarian Celts of the 5th century?
irakobra [83]

Answer:

In the 5th century, they invaded the declining Roman Empire and they gradually carved it up the between them. 'The barbarians' never intended to destroy the Roman Empire, they wanted to share in its wealth but it was declining anyway and soon broke down altogether.

(Brainliest is appreciated :)

4 0
3 years ago
Fascist intolerance towards minorities often culminates in _____.
castortr0y [4]
The correct is:deadly governmental "purging ".
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Summarize the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, will mark brainliest :D
ss7ja [257]

Answer:

The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions were political statements drafted in 1798 and 1799, in which the Kentucky and Virginia legislatures took the position that the federal Alien and Sedition Acts were unconstitutional. The Resolutions argued that the states had the right and the duty to declare unconstitutional any acts of Congress that were not authorized by the Constitution.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What was Mussolini's main goal for Italy ?
Tresset [83]
He wanted to create a new Roman Empire
5 0
3 years ago
In order to make burning the American flag illegal again, congress and the people of the United States would have to?
Ipatiy [6.2K]

Answer: I believe they would have to A) amend the constitution

Explanation:

Since burning the flag isn’t based on state law, they would have to alter the constitution. Protesting won’t be effective and electing a president who supports it won’t guarantee anything.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Migration to the united states declined during the 1920s primarily because of
    13·1 answer
  • Which quote from the declaration of independence shows showed that the colonists were influenced by John Locke's idea of social
    10·1 answer
  • The Muslims held Spain for ______ years.<br><br> 40<br> 200<br> 400<br> 700
    12·2 answers
  • The effect of human activity on Earth is not important to geography. true or false
    8·2 answers
  • Which Supreme Court case had the biggest impact on slaves in the United States prior to the Civil War?
    9·1 answer
  • Why is the right to vote so important for any groups that is being pushed around?
    6·1 answer
  • An example of expansionary fiscal policy (putting money back into the pockets of the general public) would be :
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes how a unitary government is different from the government of the United States?
    10·2 answers
  • Which two examples describe ways that corporations can give large donations to presidential candidates?
    6·1 answer
  • What did the 18th Amendment accomplish?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!