They owned all the land were responsible for their people's well-being. They were kings, generals, and religious leaders, all combined. i dont really know how
<span>The main difference of both empires is that, the Aryans were peaceful and the Mauryans were warriors. Aryan is a term that means “noble” and was used by ancient Indo-Iranian people as a self-designation. Their beliefs were rooted on religious, cultural, and linguistic focus. While the Mauryans were a group of people who are geographically extensive and powerful with their political and military empires in India. They defeated the empire of Alexander the Great in Macedonia and Persia during 316 BCE.<span>
</span></span>
Answer:
Explanation:
The customers lost their money.
I read up on a couple articles and none of them stated the bank or government paying the people back. It did state that “The state of American banks in 1933 was unsure, and there was widespread fear, based on previous closures, that banks funds were mismanaged and that hard-earned deposited money could disappear overnight.”
African's huge variety of languages and cultures discouraged unity among them. Wars fought between ethnic groups over land, water, and trade rights also prevented a unified stand. Europeans soon learned to play rival groups against each other. The competition between European nations was so fierce that they feared war among themselves. To prevent conflict, 14 European nations met at the Berlin Conference in 1884-85 to lay down rules for the division of Africa. The Europeans nations divided the continent with little regard about how Africans ethnic or linguistic groups were distributed. No African ruler was invited to attend their meetings, yet the Conference sealed Africa's fate.
