Which statement does not accurately describe the results of Latin American independence movements?

History

2 answers:

Readme [11.4K]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

The correct answer is D. Spanish didn't crush the Latin American independence revolts, so it didn't remain in control of its colonies.

Explanation:

In response to the enthronement of King Joseph Bonaparte in Spain, between 1808 and 1810 government boards that exercised sovereignty on behalf of the abdicated King Ferdinand VII were installed both in the Iberian Peninsula and in the American territories. The resistance of the American juntas to submit to all the governments formed in Spain, radicalized positions and led to the armed struggle between realists and patriots. From 1810, various American territories began to declare themselves independent national states under republican regimes, forming liberator armies, among which those led by Hidalgo and Morelos in Mexico, and those of the Argentinian Jose de San Martin and the Venezuelan Simon Bolívar in South America. The independence of the new states of America was consolidated in the 1820s, with the creation in Mexico of the Trigarante Army in 1821 and ending in South America with the destruction of the last viceroyal army in the Battle of Ayacucho in 1824.

Ivan3 years ago

5 0

I think its D. Spain crushed the revolts and remained in control of all but a few of its Latin american colonies.

You might be interested in

2. What was the Sepoy Rebellion and how did the British respond to it, both

Yuliya22 [10]

The immediate cause of the Indian Revolt of 1857, or Sepoy Mutiny, was a seemingly minor change in the weapons used by the British East India Company's troops.
The response of the British government to these protests was to repeal the Townshend Acts. They revoked all of the taxes imposed by these acts except for the tax on tea. When the Townshend taxes were imposed, there was a great deal of protest in the colonies.

3 0

3 years ago

What about democracies makes the justification effort especially prevalent as compared to its prevalence in the context of other

Stella [2.4K]

The appropriate response is government officials are judged by the electorate. The lawmaker tries particularly common when contrasted with its predominance with regards to different types of government. It is an arrangement of government in which the Nationals practice control specifically or choose agents from among themselves to shape an administering body, for example, a parliament.

3 0

3 years ago

Question 1 Leonid Brezhnev options: a. valued stability above all, blocking significant attempts to deal with economic/social pr

Black_prince [1.1K]

Answer: the correct answer is a. valued stability above all, blocking significant attempts to deal with economic/social problems.

Explanation:

Brezhnev was careful and valued stability above all and he managed to reach decisions through consensus within the Politburo.

7 0

3 years ago

What was the main reason that Athens and Sparta fought the Peloponnesian War?

Ivan

Soldiers from Thebes, Sparta's ally, tried to seize control of a town called Potidea. Caught and imprisoned, the townspeople put all 200 members of the advanced party to death. A messenger was sent to try and stop the kiling but by time the war had already started

4 0

3 years ago

How do people upbringing have an impact on hate crimes?

Contact [7]

What is a hate crime?

Current federal law defines hate crimes as any felony or crime of violence that manifests prejudice based on “race, color, religion, or national origin” (18 U.S.C. §245). Hate crimes can be understood as criminal conduct motivated in whole or in part by a negative opinion or attitude toward a group of persons. Hate crimes involve a specific aspect of the victim’s identity (e.g., race). Hate crimes are not simply biases, they are dangerous actions motivated by biases (e.g., cross burnings, physical assault).

Who is currently protected under federal hate crime law?

Presently, hate or bias-motivated crimes targeting victims because of race, color, religion, or national origin are punishable under federal law. Many states have laws which prohibit violent crimes against individuals based on these and/or other characteristics. In 1990, with the passage of the Hate Crimes Statistics Act, the federal government began to collect data about select categories of hate crimes. At present, no federal law exists that criminalizes bias-motivated crimes perpetrated against a person, property, or society that are motivated by the offender’s bias against a gender, disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity.

Are hate crimes different from other violent crimes?

Yes. Hate crimes have an effect on both the immediate target and the communities of which the individuals are a member, which differentiate them from other crimes.

What effects can hate crimes have on victims?

While violent crime victimization carries risk for psychological distress, victims of violent hate crimes may suffer from more psychological distress (e.g., depression, stress, anxiety, anger) than victims of other comparable violent crimes (Herek, Gillis, & Cogan, 1999; McDevitt, Balboni, Garcia, & Gu, 2001). Survivors of violent crimes, including hate crimes, are also at risk for developing a variety of mental health problems including depression, anxiety and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). PTSD emerges in response to an event that involves death, injury, or a threat of harm to a person. Symptoms of PTSD may include intrusive thoughts or recurring dreams, refusal or inability to discuss the event, pulling away emotionally from others, irritability, difficulty concentrating, and disturbed sleep. Depression, anxiety, and PTSD may interfere with an individual’s ability to work or to maintain healthy relationships, can lead to other problems such as substance abuse or violent behavior, and may be associated with other health problems such as severe headaches, gastrointestinal problems, and insomnia. Similar to other victims of traumatic stress, hate crime victims may enjoy better outcomes when appropriate support and resources are made available soon after the trauma.

What effect can hate crimes have on communities?

Hate crimes are different from other crimes in that the offender—whether purposefully or not—is sending a message to members of a given group that they are unwelcome and unsafe in a particular neighborhood, community, school, workplace, or other environment. Thus, the crime simultaneously victimizes a specific individual and members of the group at large. Hate crimes are often intended to threaten entire communities and do so. For example, a hate crime that targeted children in a religious day care center and an ethnic minority postal worker was intended to instill fear in members of these minority communities (Sullaway, 2004). Being part of a community that is targeted because of immutable characteristics can decrease feelings of safety and security (Boeckmann & Turpin- Petrosino, 2002). Being a member of a victimized group may also lead to mental health problems. Research suggests that witnessing discrimination against one’s group can lead to depressed emotion and lower self-esteem (McCoy & Major, 2003). More research is necessary to document the impact of hate crimes on those who share the victim’s identity.

4 0

3 years ago