Answer:
A. In the end, Walton chooses to stop before his endeavor destroys him, but Frankenstein does not.
Explanation:
Walton and Frankenstein's stories are different because in the end, Walton chooses to stop before his endeavor destroys him, but Frankenstein does not.
Frankenstein according to the book was so obsessed with his work that he cared about little else and continued even when he saw the apparent dangers, but Walton stopped before his endeavor destroyed him.
I would say In an ancient city
<span> don't think either are desirable alone or if the question is to an extreme where if one were extremely beautiful, they would also be extremely idiotic, or extremely smart but extremely ugly. </span><span>Smart is also a very broad adjective. People can have collective knowledge of just about anything. If I choose beauty, would I lack common sense or rationality? or would I just learn at a slower rate? If I choose smarts, would I just contain information without the understanding or ability to use and apply it? Knowledge without wisdom and understanding is useless.</span>
Answer:no that would not be a good idea. The reason is that it is not good to be combative because if someone loses they will cry and wine like a little baby.
Explanation:
Answer:
Personification
Explanation:
Since standing still is a human quality given to a non human thing (time) it is personification.
