I would say D as it shows a sense of in-security and a logical appeal.
Answer:
It can create tension, mystery, and surprise.
Explanation:
In a story, it is essential to maintain a professional relationship in order to ensure that the story is perfectly executed. However, in situations whereby there is a casual relationship between two or more of the characters, they will a series of unexpected events during the execution of the story and can even disrupt the execution of the story.
She should persuade her audience by including benefits of the trip to Washington D.C, historical facts, and locations. Also, New York can be used to compare to Washington D.C, so there is more opportunity to persuade the audience in going to D.C. I hope this makes sense, i may just me terrible about explaining, but i hope i kinda helped
Answer:
The correct answers are A and B.
A) It states how Van Lew acted as an important leader and manager at a time when women were generally discouraged from taking on those roles.
B) It shows that Van Lew was dedicated to a cause outside of her family and worked hard for her beliefs.
Explanation:
In the excerpt, the author develops two main ideas.
First, the author explains that Elizabeth Van Lew was a spymaster who was running a great network agents, couries and safe houses during the world war, which was not a common role for women in 19th century. She indeed played as an important leader and role model for women.
Secondly, the author suggests that Elizabeth Van Lew dedicated her life to being the leader because she believed in this cause. She even used her house for the duty and went past the family limitations which restricted the most women in that age.
Answer:
I can't understand ur question plz try again
