1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aev [14]
2 years ago
10

Can you please help me with all of this

History
1 answer:
RUDIKE [14]2 years ago
7 0

Genghis Khan was a leader with lot of great qualities, and he is regarded as a great leader, one of the greatest in history in fact.

Explanation:

Genghis Khan was a Mongol ruler of the Mongol Empire. He managed to unite the Mongol tribes and make them the greatest power of their time. Genghis Khan also set the foundations for the formation of the largest empire that the world has seen until then, only to be surpassed in size by the British Empire few centuries later.

This Mongol ruler possessed many great qualities. He was very wise, excellent tactician, loved his people, was establishing peace on the conquered territories, encouraged people of ethnic and religious backgrounds to collaborate and coexist. It is very interesting that Genghis Khan can be seen bot as a nationalist and as a liberal, from modern perspective of course.

His nationalist tendencies are seen in the fact that he loved his country, he loved his people, and he made sure that every Mongol has all of the basic needs for life secured. On the other side, his liberalism can be seen in the fact that he had nothing against people of other ethnic, cultural, and religious backgrounds, but instead he was encouraging all people to put their differences aside, collaborate, and help each other for the benefit of everyone. All in all, Genghis Khan was an excellent leader, and a model as to how many other leaders should have been in that period of time.

Learn more about the Mongol Empire brainly.com/question/11288396

#learnwithBrainly

You might be interested in
Who won at Vicksburg war?
Fynjy0 [20]
Ulysses S. Grant did, I hope this helped.
7 0
2 years ago
Explain MacMillan's conclusion that Wilson "remained a Southerner in some ways all his life." Describe how Wilson's background a
Murljashka [212]

Answer:

paki basa nalng .

Explanation:

On December 4, 1918, the George Washington sailed out of New York with the American delegation to the Peace Conference on board. Guns fired salutes, crowds along the waterfront cheered, tugboats hooted and Army planes and dirigibles circled overhead. Robert Lansing, the American secretary of state, released carrier pigeons with messages to his relatives about his deep hope for a lasting peace. The ship, a former German passenger liner, slid out past the Statue of Liberty to the Atlantic, where an escort of destroyers and battleships stood by to accompany it and its cargo of heavy expectations to Europe.

On board were the best available experts, combed out of the universities and the government; crates of reference materials and special studies; the French and Italian ambassadors to the United States; and Woodrow Wilson. No other American president had ever gone to Europe while in office. His opponents accused him of breaking the Constitution; even his supporters felt he might be unwise. Would he lose his great moral authority by getting down to the hurly-burly of negotiations? Wilson's own view was clear: the making of the peace was as important as the winning of the war. He owed it to the peoples of Europe, who were crying out for a better world. He owed it to the American servicemen. "It is now my duty," he told a pensive Congress just before he left, "to play my full part in making good what they gave their life's blood to obtain." A British diplomat was more cynical; Wilson, he said, was drawn to Paris "as a debutante is entranced by the prospect of her first ball."

Wilson expected, he wrote to his great friend Edward House, who was already in Europe, that he would stay only to arrange the main outlines of the peace settlements. It was not likely that he would remain for the formal Peace Conference with the enemy. He was wrong. The preliminary conference turned, without anyone's intending it, into the final one, and Wilson stayed for most of the crucial six months between January and June 1919. The question of whether or not he should have gone to Paris, which exercised so many of his contemporaries, now seems unimportant. From Franklin Roosevelt at Yalta to Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton at Camp David, American presidents have sat down to draw borders and hammer out peace agreements. Wilson had set the conditions for the armistices which ended the Great War. Why should he not make the peace as well?

Although he had not started out in 1912 as a foreign policy president, circumstances and his own progressive political principles had drawn him outward. Like many of his compatriots, he had come to see the Great War as a struggle between the forces of democracy, however imperfectly represented by Britain and France, and those of reaction and militarism, represented all too well by Germany and Austria-Hungary. Germany's sack of Belgium, its unrestricted submarine warfare and its audacity in attempting to entice Mexico into waging war on the United States had pushed Wilson and American public opinion toward the Allies. When Russia had a democratic revolution in February 1917, one of the last reservations that the Allies included an autocracy vanished. Although he had campaigned in 1916 on a platform of keeping the country neutral, Wilson brought the United States into the war in April 1917. He was convinced that he was doing the right thing. This was important to the son of a Presbyterian minister, who shared his father's deep religious conviction, if not his calling.

Wilson was born in Virginia in 1856, just before the Civil War. Although he remained a Southerner in some ways all his life in his insistence on honor and his paternalistic attitudes toward women and blacks he also accepted the war's outcome. Abraham Lincoln was one of his great heroes, along with Edmund Burke and William Gladstone. The young Wilson was at once highly idealistic and intensely ambitious. After four very happy years at Princeton and an unhappy stint as a lawyer, he found his first career in teaching and writing. By 1890 he was back at Princeton, a star member of the faculty. In 1902 he became its president, supported virtually unanimously by the trustees, faculty and students.

6 0
2 years ago
Question 1 of 20
Ksivusya [100]

The conclusion that is supported by the preamble of the Declaration of Independence is that a. Governments exist to protect the people who created them.

<h3>What is the Declaration of Independence?</h3>

This is the document that officially declared that the British would no longer be the governing country of the American colonies and that the colonies were instead declaring independence.

The preamble to the Declaration declared how governments should exist to protect the rights of the people who created them and that when a government can no longer do this, it is not legitimate.

Options for this question include:

  • a.Governments exist to protect the people who created them.
  • b. it sometimes becomes necessary for one people to separate from another.
  • c. governments should not be overthrown for light and trivial reasons.
  • d. those who abolish their government are accountable to mankind for their action.

Find out more on the Declaration of Independence at brainly.com/question/1819326

#SPJ1

8 0
1 year ago
What happened as a result of the boxer rebellion
NNADVOKAT [17]
Hey, thanks for submitting your question!

As a result of the Boxer rebellion, came the downfall of the <span>Qing Dynasty</span>


8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question 5 of 15
ratelena [41]

The anwser is A 100 percent

Explanation: You can look it up, they settlers wanted to travel west for a better living

4 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • What is the
    11·2 answers
  • How do leaders come into power in a theocracy government?
    9·1 answer
  • Describir brevemente estrategias utilizadas en la guerra fria por las superpotencias
    13·1 answer
  • 3. How did "blitzkrieg” work?
    5·1 answer
  • What is one of the reasons the Roman Republic we came the Roman Empire
    7·1 answer
  • Do you think objects should have been removed from the wreck of the TitanicWhy do you think humans have a desire to explore the
    8·1 answer
  • What action did FDR take to end the cycle of bank closures?
    7·2 answers
  • What were europe's advancements in the 1200s?
    15·1 answer
  • What was one major effect of industrialization on American society?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is true of the principle of tabula rasa
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!