1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
timofeeve [1]
3 years ago
13

The Precambrian eon is separated from the Phanerozoic eon in the fossil record because of

History
1 answer:
Vsevolod [243]3 years ago
5 0

The Precambrian eon is separated from the Phanerozoic eon in the fossil record because of poorer record of fossils than that of the succeeding Phanerozoic eon.This is because many Precambrian rocks have been heavily metamorphosed,obscuring their origins,while others have been destroyed by erosion,or remain deeply buried beneath Phanerozoic strata.The Phanerozoic Eon covers 541 years to the present while Precambrian Eon covers 4.6 billion years.

You might be interested in
The Treaty of Versailles required Germany pay a huge sum of money (called reparations), to the winners of the Great War which we
DedPeter [7]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Germany had to give up land,money and they had to say that they caused it.

8 0
3 years ago
Which colony treated all religions equally? Pennsylvania New York New Jersey Maryland
dalvyx [7]
Pennsylvania. because it was founded by William Penn a Quaker
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The cradle of civilization was in central Europe.<br><br> true or false
IRINA_888 [86]
False this happened in Near Eastern Neolithics, Mesopotamia and Egypt
3 0
3 years ago
Why did agriculture thrive in the Muslim empires
givi [52]
Some historians have called the diffusion of new crops and agricultural methods to the West through Muslim Spain an agricultural revolution because they had a major impact not only on agricultural production but also on incomes, population levels, urban growth, distribution of labor, industrial output, clothing,
4 0
3 years ago
Explain how the concept of mutually assured destruction influenced the course of the Cold War
Strike441 [17]
Mutually assured destruction was an agreed upon course of action that stated if two countries were to get into a nuclear war, a majority of the populations of both the countries would dwindle and utterly destroy both. Because both the U.S. and U.S.S.R. did not want to lose themselves as countries and their populations, the Cold war never had any nuclear action taken, hence the nme Cold War.

Hope this helped :)
5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Indigo, tobacco, and rice were labor-intensive crops. This means they needed many ___________
    5·2 answers
  • Why is mining important to the economy of the United States. &gt; It employs many workers &gt; Gold is expensive &gt;Minerals ar
    5·1 answer
  • What system of government is a <br> dictatorship
    11·2 answers
  • How was Islam able to cross the Sahara Desert in the eighth century?
    12·1 answer
  • 1. Which of the following was an advantage held by the North during the Civil War? A. The North had more natural resources. B. T
    11·1 answer
  • Help me with this please
    5·1 answer
  • How are human rights and construction rights different?
    7·1 answer
  • How is the Korean war an example of U.S. containment policy ?
    11·2 answers
  • World War 2 Begins
    8·1 answer
  • In July of 1775 the Second Continental Congress drafted the "Olive Branch Petition." What was the purpose of this document? A) t
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!