1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SOVA2 [1]
2 years ago
5

What is the formal role of the judicial branch in amending the Constitution?

History
2 answers:
Lady bird [3.3K]2 years ago
5 0

The formal role of the judicial branch in amending the constitution is option B. It has no formal role in the process.

The system of federal courts along with the judges that interprets laws made by the legislative branch constitute the judicial branch of the U.S. government. These laws are enforced by the executive branch.

At the top of the judicial branch are the nine justices of the Supreme Court.

Masja [62]2 years ago
4 0

B - It has no formal role in the process

You might be interested in
In the long term, industrialization allowed countries to be able to
Vlad [161]
I have absolutely no idea what the answer is
6 0
2 years ago
Which describes Sumerian writing? A. cuneiform B. hieroglyphics C. scribing D. calligraphy
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]
The answer is A. Cuneiform
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following quotes from the Constitution describes the Senate?
Neko [114]
"The... shall choose their other Officers, and also a President pro tempore, in the absence of the Vice President, or when he shall exercise the Office of President of the United States."
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Northerners_____ counting slaves as part of the population if they had no rights, while southerners _____ counting slaves. Accor
polet [3.4K]

Answer:

Northerners opposed counting slaves as part of the population if they had no rights, while southerners supported counting slaves. According to the compromise, five slaves would count as three free persons when calculating how many representatives each state received in the House of Representatives.

Explanation:

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise established during the 1787 Philadelphia Convention between the colonies of the North and the South. This compromise considered, in the rules for counting people represented in the House of Representatives, that a slave was counted up to three fifths of a free man.  

The question was important, as the population count would then be used to determine the number of seats each state would have in the US House of Representatives. The Compromise gave a disproportionate representation of the slave states in the House of Representatives compared to the voters in the free states until the Civil War.

6 0
3 years ago
What do Rwanda and Sudan have in common?
Orlov [11]
<span>Both are densely populated</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did the role of Egyptian pharaohs differ from the role of Mesopotamian rulers?
    10·2 answers
  • What do a group of labor union members do?
    8·1 answer
  • What were achievements and failures of the federalist era?
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the reason that Indians sought independence?
    11·2 answers
  • WILL MARK BRAINLIEST LOTS OF POINTS
    11·1 answer
  • What was meant by, "Curry was a 'New Mexican sheriff of fame.'"? a. Curry had a very bad reputation among many Indians. b. Curry
    15·1 answer
  • In the mid-twentieth century, the Cuban government took control of all US-owned oil refineries located in Cuba in order to run t
    5·1 answer
  • What are the changes that emerged out of the Renaissance in religion and the sciences​
    5·1 answer
  • Pls help me
    10·1 answer
  • Why did large companies take over the mining of underground lodes
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!