The more wealth that you have the more power that you have over people
Resources can be defined as anything present in our surroundings that satisfies our needs.
In actuality, the human race itself is a natural resource. They improve the available natural resources and turn them into usable "resources." These are the numerous resources based on different factors: All naturally occurring life forms are considered to be biotic resources. Like all flora and fauna, including other animals, plants, and humans.
While abiotic materials are also present in nature, they are lifeless. like rocks, stones, and metals. Renewable resources are substances found in nature that can be renewed. wind, water, trees, solar energy, etc. Individual resources mostly refer to privately owned land, buildings, farms, plantations, etc. All community members share community-owned resources. resources. Like farms, homes, meadows, playgrounds, cemeteries, picnic areas, and public parks.
Learn more about resources hear :
brainly.com/question/24162278
#SPJ9
I think your missing a picture or further info. but american currency is USD ( united states dollar)
Answer:
Study more on the content that you struggle with and less on what you already do well in. Also, focus more on graded assignments like quizzes because they fluctuate your grade more than busy work like homework.
Explanation:
Also, nice.
From now until 2025, the structure and policy of the United States government should remain largely the same. For instance, the number of justices on the Supreme Court should remain the same from now to 2025, as it has since 1869. Nine justices work because there are enough to keep each other in check but not too many that the justices are inefficient. (Or at least as inefficient as they would be if more were added.) Filibustering should continue to be allowed. While it is arguably a waste of time, filibustering helps the parties keep each other in check. Gerrymandering should be adjusted if not removed because it takes away the importance of voters in certain districts because they are either so much a majority that they will win either way or so much of a minority that they will lose either way. If gerrymandering was taken away, then the people would have a greater voice in who represents them. Campaign financing is tricky, but I think it may be best if the restrictions were loosened as to who can donate how much but if more transparency was required. There may be political opposition to removing gerrymandering because it allows many politicians to stay in power for a long time without many significant challengers. What we can do, as young citizens, is vote for people who believe in making these changes and petition/lobby for these changes to be made.
