Red yellow and blue because when they are all moved at a high speed they combine to make white
Answer:
It's best to invest in the second economy
Explanation:
The question does not provide information on the hypothetical economic expectations of the two economies, but as a risk-averse investor, it's a better idea to try to "spread" the risk instead of concentrating it.
In the first economy, conditions might or might not be good. If they are good, returns will be extraordinary because all stocks will provide good returns, but if conditions take a turn for the worse, all stocks prices will fall and the financial consequences will be catastrophic.
In the second economy, results might never be as good as in the first economy, but they also will not ever be as bad. The risk is spread between various stocks, and while some may fall in price, others will rise, and viceversa. For a risk-adverse investor, this a far better option.
Answer:
Year 2= $4,687.5
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Purchase price= $34,000
Useful life= 8 years
Salvage value= $9,000
<u>To calculate the depreciation expense under the double-declining-balance, we need to use the following formula:</u>
<u></u>
Annual depreciation= 2*[(book value)/estimated life (years)]
Year 1= [(34,000 - 9,000)/8]*2= $6,250
Year 2= [(25,000 - 6,250)/8]*2= $4,687.5
First option.
Indeed, some people may benefit by paying the artificial price, but not all as other people may not be able to satisffy all their demand as a price ceiling will also effectively create a shortage due to the low prices disincentivizing producers.
What is the following may I ask? You can invest in real estate by either buying a property or buying into a real estate investment fund.
