<span>Tasha
has finished the second draft of an essay about Robert Frost’s poetry.
She is just about to save the draft. What is the most useful way for her
to name the file?
A.
Frost Essay Draft 2</span>
<u>Answer:</u>
<u>They are both of Armenian origin who pursue their dreams.</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Note that the story of Aram is captured in a series of short stories about the life of this character from his youthful days.
First, we are told about Aram in the story, “<em>The Summer of the Beautiful White Horse,” </em>who at the time was a nine years old boy of belonging to an immigrant Armenian family in living in the United States.
However, Aram’s dealings with uncle Melik was mentioned in the third story, “The Pomegranate Trees,” where we are told that uncle has a goal pursuing mindset like Aram, Melik decides to grow an orchard in the desert, although it didn't produce well in the end, but he tried pursuing the goal; a quality that both him and Aram shares.
Answer:
Taking over the Kingdom and the Queen
Explanation:
King Claudius addresses the court as the new king, informing how he, in the time of deep sorrow over the death of his brother, 'fought discretion with nature' to continue with the affairs of the state since it was monumental loss, yet the state must have a king. Taking the welfare of the 'warlike' state into account, Claudius marries his brother's wife, 'the imperial jointress' and hence he says he has done a right thing. Though he calls it 'a defeated joy' with a dropping eye, he usurps the kingdom very smartly. Claudius is quick in marrying his brother's wife since both 'funeral' and 'marriage' go simultaneously. Claudius's hurry in marriage is a scheme in taking the queen to his side in order to isolate Hamlet, the rightful heir and to prove to the world how much he cares about the kingdom and his dead brother.
The answer is B: ad hominem.
A logical fallacy is a failed form of argument that reaches a conclusion by means of invalid proofs that are not justified. Ad hominem (which could be translated as “against the man”) is one such logical fallacy and it involves an argument based on a direct attack of a person´s character or circumstances when they are not related to the content of the argument itself.
