1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lisov135 [29]
3 years ago
8

Compare and contrast the rhetorical techniques used by Henry Highland Garnet and Frederick Douglass. Which speaker and which tec

hnique(s) do you find most persuasive?
English
1 answer:
sasho [114]3 years ago
4 0
Henry garnet is it I
You might be interested in
The tone of a piece of literature is determined by:
masha68 [24]
<span> because of the repetition and passion of the words. </span>
5 0
3 years ago
What detail about Goemon is implied in the Tex
Hunter-Best [27]

Answer:

A. He is tired of the sea

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Plz answer these to ​
tatuchka [14]

Answer:

the answer for these is all the opposite from the other

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
What's the question Holden keeps asking the different cab drivers?
masha68 [24]

Answer:

Holden keeps asking them, if they knew where the ducks who live in Central Park South lagoon go when the water freezes over, which makes them (cab drivers) to question is mental state.

Explanation:

From the given question, Holden keeps asking the different can drivers  if they knew where the ducks who live in Central Park South lagoon go when the water freezes over.

Also, when he asked same question to a taxi driver, the taxi-driver frowned at his question and then begins to talk about something else like fish instead. before now Holden asks the taxi-driver to have a drink with him, which he rejected.

6 0
3 years ago
Record the names of the discussion participants. If you organized the discussion, record how you know the other person and summa
ipn [44]

Answer:

Here are the steps to organize a debate:

1.- Choose a topic of interest that produces controversy

2.-Designate or invite participants in advance according to the topic.

3.- Appoint a moderator to coordinate the development of the debate. It is necessary to prepare a questionnaire with questions that generates controversy in the arguments of the participants.

4.- A secretary must be appointed to write down all the main ideas presented by each participant.

5.- According to the number of participants, as well as the duration of the debate, 3 minutes may be available for each exhibitor or participant.

6.- At the end of the debate The Secretary must present the Summary of the exhibitors' ideas

Three are the most important people for the organization of a Debate:

Moderator or Coordinator

Determine the time of the presentation of ideas for each participant (usually 3 to 5 minutes). Also, the moderator establishes the order and assigns the shifts for each participant.

Secretary

He is responsible for writing down the main ideas presented by the participants. It also makes a final summary of the Debate. The secretary must be impartial.

Competitor

They argue with arguments the issue they are defending. They should be prepared well in advance on each topic to be presented, and also listen carefully to what is stated on the opposite side.

During the debate there are rules that must be followed to contribute to its success. Here are the most relevant:

1.- Objectivity

2.- Tolerance regarding differences of ideas

3.- Respect for the time allocated by the Moderator

4.- Avoid teasing towards the ideas of other participants

5.- Respect the intervention of the participants

Part of the success of the debate is due to the attitude of the participants and how they develop throughout the process. Here the most important recommendations:

1.- Clarity: Avoid the use of terms that may be misinterpreted by any of the participants.

2.- Evidence: It is better not to express the arguments with phrases such as: "According to ...", "The text says .." It is advisable to support ideas with real events.

3.- Emotivity: Limit the use of expressions that provoke angry responses in the other participants, which try to devalue them by their political position.

4.- Causality: It is better not to give conclusions that lead to fallacies

5.- Credibility in the information: Cite sources that support the credibility of the above

6.- Credibility in the information: Cite sources that support the credibility of the above

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is a disadvantage to writing your ideas rather than speaking them?
    5·2 answers
  • Why do some clouds look different from other clouds good luck and please help me
    13·1 answer
  • She could find the baby nowhere or Nowhere she could find the baby adverbs of position
    12·1 answer
  • Read the following excerpt from "The Cask of Amontillado" and answer question.
    7·2 answers
  • Identify two examples of figurative language that douglass uses to elicit an emotional response from his audience. explain how e
    14·1 answer
  • Can someone tell me what is abstract and concrete noun is in these questions??? PLEASEEEE!!!!!
    11·2 answers
  • Someone help please write step by step!!!!!!
    6·1 answer
  • What do the supporting sentences do in the body of a process paragraph?
    7·1 answer
  • How did Napoleon keep the animal population from revolting in George Orwell’s Animal Farm
    5·1 answer
  • Why do people love music?​
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!