All categories

3 years ago

Answer the following question in 3-4 complete sentences.

2 answers:

5 0

Answer:The Supreme Court has final appellate jurisdiction in all cases arising under the Constitution, so the Supreme Court has the ultimate authority to decide whether statutes are consistent with the Constitution.

Hope this helps! :)

Olegator [25]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Anselm Kiefer is the artist and the painting could be midgard

You might be interested in

(06.04 MC) How did the Monroe Doctrine lead the way for U.S. imperialism? (1 point) Select one: a. It threatened military action

kaheart [24]

Answer:

The answer is A.

Explanation:

The Monroe Doctrine of 1823 paved the way for imperialist US foreign policies because it essentially said that the country would oppose any new European colonies in the Americas. The sub-text here is that, if Europeans were not exerting imperialistic influence in the western hemisphere, then the United States would.

At the time when the Monroe Doctrine was issued, many Spanish and Portuguese colonies in the Americas were gaining independence. It seemed as though European influence in the region was waning and the United States, as the most powerful and influential nation in the hemisphere was poised to pick up where the European powers left off.

4 0

3 years ago

If Mrs. Clark decides to watch a movie for two hours but could have finished test grading in those two hours, the test grading -

yan [13]

Direct Answer :

If Mrs. Clark decides to watch a movie for two hours but could have finished test grading in those two hours, the test grading -- or the opportunity cost of this decision to watch a movie -- is the converse of her action.

Reason :

As we know that Mrs Clark thought of watching a movie that is two hpurs but during the same time, she could have finished the test grading. Tgere are two opportunities here- watch a movie or do test grade. As she should do the test grading, which is more important but watched a movie, her action got reversed.

Conclusion :

Therefore, we can say that the answer is converse.

Hope this helps!

4 0

3 years ago

2.) What was one reason the Founders had to replace the Articles of Confederation?

solniwko [45]

Answer:

In 1781, James Madison (1751–1836) asked Thomas Jefferson (1743–1826) for his account of those tumultuous pivotal days in which the Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confederation were drafted. Recognizing the importance of the process for the Revolution and for posterity, Thomas Jefferson prepared his notes of the proceedings in Congress, June 7–August 1, 1776. On this page, Jefferson’s notes reflect his interest in Article XVII, about representation in Congress.

1 of 2

8 0

3 years ago

I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!!!!!! PLZ HELP ASAP!!!!!!!

Mamont248 [21]

Answer:

Explanation:

The British imposed taxes after the f&I wat. C seems like an answer but would make them WAAAYYYY To powerful. Claiming World Domination

7 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why was the Cherokees last treaty a sham?

Advocard [28]

Answer: A minority party of Cherokees concluded that their only course was to negotiate a removal treaty with the United States. ... The treaty, signed at New Echota, Georgia, in December 1835, established a deadline of two years for the Cherokees to leave their homelands.

Hope this helps!!! Good luck!!! ;)

3 0

3 years ago