1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
maxonik [38]
3 years ago
13

According to the Charter of 1732, there were three primary reasons for colonizing Georgia. Based on your knowledge of Georgia's

colonial history, evaluate the success of each of the motivating factors for colonization of Georgia as listed in the Charter of 1732.
Answer in a full paragraph.

please someone help me struggling really bad on this question.
History
1 answer:
GuDViN [60]3 years ago
5 0

The reason the Charter of 1732 is of importance is that it establishes and sets the rules for the colonists, mostly English debtors, who had colonized there.  And from that beginning, it establishes the basis for a common occurrence, and was the basic founding of the other twelve colonies.  Therefore, it grants authority to James Oglethorpe to colonize, beyond the reasons listed in the Charter, of Charity, Economics and Defense.  It is the basis for King George granting the trustees the legitimacy and power to govern the colony.  

You might be interested in
List at least five ways in which the government is involved in the economic lives of the government or of its citizens.
cluponka [151]

The government

(1) provides the legal and social framework within which the economy operates

(2) maintains competition in the marketplace

(3) provides public goods and services

(4) redistributes income

(5) cor- rects for externalities

(6) takes certain actions to stabilize the economy.

 hopes this helps !!

3 0
3 years ago
what explanations did the delegates have for brockdorff rantzau reading his reply while remaining seated ?
ra1l [238]

Brockdorff-Rantzau was Germany's foreign minister when the Treaty of Versailles was signed. The treaty was meant to put an end to World War I.

Initially, the German delegation had great trust in the process, as they had been promise a treaty that would ensure "a peace without victory." However, what they obtained was very different. Brockdorff-Rantzau believed the terms of the treaty to be extremely harsh towards Germany. The country lost 13 percent of its territory and 10 percent of its population. Moreover, it was denied membership in the League of Nations, forced to pay significant reparations and forced to claim that they took sole responsibility for the war.

The delegates explained this by justifying the amount of destruction that they believed Germany was responsible for, and by referring to the actions of Germany during the war. Despite a great amount of debate, Germany was eventually forced to sign the treaty, creating a lot of resentment in the country.

8 0
3 years ago
What is a country that uses the market economy?
LenaWriter [7]

According to a 2013 Index of Economic Freedom, the United States, Canada, Denmark, the United Kingdom, Hong Kong and Mauritius have a market economy. Most market economies have a degree of state-dictated planning and are thus categorized as mixed economies.

Hope this Helps! ;)

8 0
3 years ago
Which pair of events shows a cause-and-effect relationship?
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]

Answer:The horse is not native to ancient Egyptians and the exact date of its introduction to the country is not certain. The horse is believed to have come to Egypt with the Hyksos around 1600BC, who settled in the Nile Delta from the Levant, looking for grazing land for their cattle. By 1700BC these new settlers had been in the area, marrying the native women, for long enough that they could take political control. The Hyksos founded their own fortified capital in the Delta, controlling Memphis and forging alliances with kingdom of Kush, while the Egyptian kings retained control of Thebes. The Hyksos proved very difficult to expel from Egypt due to their competence with the horse and chariot, a method of warfare that the Egyptians had previously barely come into contact with. But this was only so if they could fight on a level battlefield. The lightweight, high-speed chariots they utilized became very dangerous on all but the flattest terrain and a group of charging horses can rapidly become uncontrollable, potentially putting the passengers in a great deal of danger. The Ancient Egyptian Horse and Chariot The chariots used by the Egyptians were lightweight, fast vehicles with two wheels, drawn by two horses. Within each chariot rode two men, the driver and the fighter. It is thought that initially the chariot was used as transport for the aristocracy and also for hunting. Since the turnover of chariot horses was likely to be very high, it is probable that a large stock of breeding horses were kept, to make sure there was a constant supply for battle. In the early years of the presence of the horse in Egypt, it is highly likely that horses were too precious to risk, so until stock increased horses were used very carefully. The Horse and the Ancient Egyptian Elite The horse soon became a much loved and prized possession for the Egyptian elite, particularly the Pharaoh. The horses first introduced to Egypt are smaller than those we are used to today, and had features similar to those of the Arab breed. Yoke measurements from chariots found in tombs give the horses an average height of 1.35m at the withers, or 13.2hh. However these animals could measure up to 1.50m, or 15hh. Ramses II mentions his horses in the Poem of Kadesh, acknowledging them for their part in the battle of Kadesh. This in itself might seem a strange thing; the Pharaoh rarely shared the credit for a victory with another human, so why should such praise fall upon horses? Relief showing Ramses II at the Battle of Kadesh. “I defeated millions of foreign countries, being alone, being on ‘Victory in Thebes’ and ‘Mut is Contented’ my great horses. They it is whom I found to support me when I was alone fighting many foreign countries… They it is whom I found in the midst of the battle together with the charioteer Menna my shield bearer…”

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Approximately what percentage of African Americans lived in the South at the start of World War I?
astra-53 [7]
Hey I'm not the best but l think it is 

90%

hope l helped
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The Manhattan project would impact the United States in which of the following ways
    10·2 answers
  • What were the effects of Vietnam’s rebellion against France?
    10·1 answer
  • Which european country took the lead in the exploration and colonization of africa, asia, and the americas in the early 1400s?
    12·1 answer
  • How has free trade had different impacts on developing and developed countries
    12·2 answers
  • What did Jackson's unofficial cabinet become known as?
    13·2 answers
  • Which nation is on the "horn" of Africa?<br> A:Djibouti<br> B:Ethiopia<br> C:Kenya<br> D:Somalia
    8·1 answer
  • Who is the first prime minister of Australia
    15·2 answers
  • 5. Name one provision of the Concordat of 1801.
    10·1 answer
  • Project help?<br> please help
    14·2 answers
  • Drag the tiles to the correct boxes to complete the pairs.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!