1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Brut [27]
3 years ago
9

Adding a prefix or suffix sometimes changes the spelling of the root?

English
2 answers:
e-lub [12.9K]3 years ago
5 0
Yes, it can, depending on the word. Prefixes, however, almost never change the root word. The most common changes of a root when adding suffixes are the removal of a final E that follows a consonant (e.g. diving), or the change of a Y to an I (e.g. silliness). 
slavikrds [6]3 years ago
5 0

yes is the answer to the problom


You might be interested in
A Visit To Grandmother..
GenaCL600 [577]
Happiness because he or she is visiting her grandmother and possibly excitement
5 0
3 years ago
What is one difference between primary and secondary succession?
Sergio [31]

One difference between primary and secondary succession is that; the secondary succession begins on soil while primary succession begins on newly exposed surfaces.

<h3>Further Explanation: </h3>

Ecological succession

  • It is a gradual process by which ecosystems undergo changes and develop over a period of time.
  • The changes in an ecosystem occurs as a result of interaction between organisms and the environment through processes such as growth and reproduction.
<h3>Types of Ecological succession; </h3><h3>Primary succession </h3>
  • This is a type of succession that takes place in lifeless areas as a result of disturbances such as glaciers, lava flow from volcanoes, sand dunes, etc.
  • These regions are not capable of sustaining life of organisms as a result of the disturbances caused by those factors.
<h3>Secondary succession   </h3>
  • Secondary succession is an ecological succession that results from disturbances such as forest fires, abandoned field or after occurrence of floods.
<h3>Differences between secondary and primary succession  </h3>
  • The difference between the two types of ecological succession is the fact that; primary succession starts with bare rocks while secondary succession starts with existing soil and dirt.
  • Additionally, it takes about a thousand years for primary succession to develop while secondary succession takes about a 100 or more years to develop.

Keywords: Ecological succession, primary succession, secondary succession

<h3>Learn more about:   </h3>
  • Ecological succession: brainly.com/question/4723069
  • Primary succession: brainly.com/question/4723069
  • Secondary succession: brainly.com/question/4723069

Level: High school  

Subject: Biology

Topic: Ecological succession

Sub-topic: Types of succession

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does this poem resemble an Elizabethan sonnet?
den301095 [7]

Answer:

It contains exactly 14 lines.

Explanation:

This poem is written in free verse, and has no rhyme scheme, the only thing in common that it has with the Elizabethan sonnet, which has a strict structure and a rhyme scheme that goes like this:

ABAB CDCD EFEF GG.

As this poem has no rhyme scheme detectable, the only way that it resembles a Elizabethan sonnet is the fact that it has 14 lines, in this case, the format doesn´t allow you to see it but the whole:

"Like childre aling the graveled walks of the garden, Diego´s"

That is a whole line, but the format can´t keep it together.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read the line from "Harlem [2]."
Eva8 [605]

Answer:

C, it creates an uneasy tone.

Explanation:

When one thinks of explode, they think of destruction. Let's say the world ending. This is an uneasy topic.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If they ________7 John, they would have given him a sound whipping, but he ________8 out of their reach. Look at the blank with
4vir4ik [10]

Option B - had run

<u>Explanation:</u>

  • The answer that correctly completes the sentence is "had run." This sentence is in the past tense and so only verbs in the past tense or past perfect tense can be used to complete the sentence. 'Had run' is in the past perfect tense which indicates an action that already has happened.
  • In the case of run, the verb is in the present tense.
  • In option C, have run, the verb used is in the present participle tense.
  • Option D, is wrong because there is no verb as runned in the English language. Past tense for run is ran.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • I don’t understand the text being given.
    11·1 answer
  • Which guidewords would appear on the same dictionary page as the word infer?
    11·2 answers
  • How can these scientific magazines be evaluated as
    8·1 answer
  • Was John Lauren’s and Hamilton right in their challenge to duel Charles lee
    8·1 answer
  • Why does the narrator throw the umbrella down the sewer after the car accident in "The White Umbrella"?
    10·1 answer
  • To which character’s experiences in The Woman Warrior would an American teenager most likely relate?
    15·1 answer
  • Ummmm I NEED HELP ASAP TANGERINE BOOK
    13·1 answer
  • Change Humpty Dumpty into a story how can I do this .​
    15·1 answer
  • What is Nick vujicic​
    6·1 answer
  • HELP ME ILL GIVE BRAINLY TO BEST ANSWER:
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!