The red liquid rises when the temperature gets warmer and falls when the temperature gets colder
Answer:
preventing individual states from having their own currencies.
Explanation:
In the text shown above, Madison discourages allowing individual currencies for each state. He believes that this would weaken trade in the union, in addition to creating strife between the trade established between the states, which would be highly damaging to the country as a whole.
According to Madison, the ideal would be for a single currency to be established throughout the union, this could be done with the ratification of the constitution, which would establish the poribition of individual currencies for each state, but a national currency that should be used by everyone in the territory national.
The real reason for maintaining armies is the same reason why some men buy expensive sports cars... overcompensating.
Seriously, think of armies as insurance. Even if it's small, amateurish, and under-funded, it's likely to give potential bullies a little pause. (Of course, a big country like Iraq can sweep up a little country like Kuwait in no time flat, as we all know).
Part of the answer is social/ economic/ political inertia. The military is part of the playground for the elite and privileged. (I use the word playground as in "fork over your lunch money, weakling.") Who wants to get rid of their army just to balance the budget? I sure haven´t seen "fire soldier-boys" on any IMF or World Bank wish lists
A lot of countries, fragile democracies, say, find armies to be an effective tool to use on internal "problems." In a pinch, a loyal military can keep your nation away from chaos. On the other hand, they work equally well to keep dictators in power.
<span>Many countries do get a lot more mileage out of their armies than Iceland or Costa Rica could possibly get. Obviously, a lot of African countries find them pretty handy.
</span>
Also, keep this quote in mind
<span>"It takes two countries to maintain peace and only one to make war"</span>
Answer: neo-isolationists want to stay out of world affairs (a is correct).
Explanation: USA entered world politics (i.e. not only hemispheric politics) in Spanish-American world (McKinley and Theodore Roosevelt) which continued during the First World War (USA was one of Allies waging the War against Italy, Germany and Austro-Hungarian Empire). After the First World War USA decided for politics of isolationism. Situation changed during F.D.Roosevelt´s presidency (1941 Pearl Harbor). Since then USA are crucial super power in terms of world order. During the WW I a WW II term "isolationism" referred to European affairs. Today it refers to world affairs.
Answer:
<h3>As air rises,the pressure decreases. lt lower pressure at higher altitudes that causes the temperature to be colder on top of a mountain than at sea level </h3>
Explanation:
<h3>I hope it helps ❤❤❤</h3><h3>Merry Christmas. </h3>
