Answer:
When it was signed in 1787, the Constitution had a preamble and seven main parts, called articles. The 15th Amendment— which was passed by Congress on February 26, 1869, and ratified on February 3, 1870 — guarantees the right to vote and guarantees that right cannot be denied based on race.
Explanation:
I hope that works for you
Some countries often have issues due to a lot of factors. The problem made China reluctant to improve relations with the United States is American support for Taiwan.
<h3>The relationship between China and the United States </h3>
- The relationship between the China and the United States has been very difficult since 1949. due to China policy, the U.S. does not support de jure Taiwan independence.
But the United State did does support Taiwan's membership in the international organizations, such as the World Trade Organization, Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum, etc.
In 2018, when the relations between the U. S. and Taiwan was official. This has made China was slow to improve relations with the United States, as China does not see Taiwan independent.
Learn more about American support for Taiwan from
brainly.com/question/1370427
Answer: One obstacle was dealing with other countries that were trying to push
Explanation:
Great Britain and Spain were interfering with our trade as well as encouraging the Native Americans to attack us.
Answer:
An arms race denotes a rapid increase in the quantity or quality of instruments of military power by rival states in peacetime. The first modern arms race took place when France and Russia challenged the naval superiority of Britain in the late nineteenth century. Germany’s attempt to surpass Britain’s fleet spilled over into World War I, while tensions after the war between the United States, Britain and Japan resulted in the first major arms-limitation treaty at the Washington Conference. The buildup of arms was also a characteristic of the Cold War between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, though the development of nuclear weapons changed the stakes for the par
Over the past century, the arms race metaphor has assumed a prominent place in public discussion of military affairs. But even more than the other colorful metaphors of security studies–balance of power, escalation, and the like–it may cloud rather than clarify understanding of the dynamics of international rivalries.
An arms race denotes a rapid, competitive increase in the quantity or quality of instruments of military or naval power by rival states in peacetime. What it connotes is a game with a logic of its own. Typically, in popular depictions of arms races, the political calculations that start and regulate the pace of the game remain obscure. As Charles H. Fairbanks, Jr., has noted, “The strange result is that the activity of the other side, and not one’s own resources, plans, and motives, becomes the determinant of one’s behavior.” And what constitutes the “finish line” of the game is the province of assertion, rather than analysis. Many onlookers, and some participants, have claimed that the likelihood of war increases as the accumulation of arms proceeds apace.
Explanation:
