The south had susceeded from the union rendering any union law useless, but garunteed freedom if they were to come to the union, inspiring many to fight back
The way in which Thomas Jefferson might use to describe the common man are:
- A man who is at the center of the U.S economy
- A man who is an independent farmer.
<h3>Who is Thomas Jefferson?</h3>
He was an American statesman who was a fierce advocate for democracy and independence and was one of the American founding fathers and eventually the 3rd American president.
Hence, we can note that Thomas Jefferson, had his own views about the common man who he believed was supposed to be at the center of the U.S economy and also an independent farmer who feeds himself and also sells his farm produce.
Read more about Thomas Jefferson here:
brainly.com/question/4869951
Answer:
They pushed for laws to discourage immigration or deny political rights to immigrants.
Explanation:
In history, Nativism was a political string that exalted the interests and the rights of the national population over its migrants. It was mainly tied with the embodiment of measures to dominate immigration flows, specially of Chinese immigrants.
The navists employed missions to boycott German and Irish goods, because they did not want to contribute the econimic infrastructure and enlargement of the immigrants.
According to Al Bakri, Kumbi Saleh (Ghana) consisted of two towns. In one town lived the arabs, it held twelve mosquets and numerous wells of sweet water. In this town lived learned men, as well as jurists and religious men. Six miles away laid the city where the king lived (Al Ghaba), in a palace surrounded by a defensive wall.
Only the king and his heir could wear sewn clothes and other accessories, signs of wealth, while the common people that followed his religion could only dress with simplicity, shaving their beards and hair. The king's way of living would exude power, wealth and magnificence, and his followers could only show humility by kneeling and sprinting their heads with dust. While the arabs would greet him by clapping.
As I understand it, the customs in arab lands were much more equal, there were not big social differences between its inhabitants. In the other part of the city, this was not the case, there would be big social differences between the king and its followers, that the author doesn't name bi its etniciti, nationality or religion. They were just the followers of the king.
