Answer:
A. $840,000
B. Discount
C. Annual interest expense on these bonds will be more than the amount of interest paid each year.
Explanation:
Data
Bonds issued = $21,000,000
Coupin rate = 4.0%
Market Interest rate = 4.46%
Requirement A: Annual interest amount
Interest amount = Bonds issued x coupon rate
Interest amount = $21,000,000 x 4.0%
Interest amount = $840,000
Requirement B: Whether it is Premium or Discount?
Bonds that Atom Endeavour Co. issued are discount as you can clearly see in the data that the market rate is higher than the coupon rate. Investors who will buy these bonds surely expect a capital gain.
Requirement C:
The discount on the issue of bonds is amortized to interest expense over the life of the bond, therefore the interest expense on these bonds will be more than the amount of interest paid each year,
Heyyyyyy thanks for the points, have a nice day/night wtv :)
Answer - A (7 years)
WORKINGS
To calculate how long it would take for the new refrigerator to pay for
itself in lower utility costs, the cost of new refrigerator will be divided by lower utility cost per
year
Cost of new refrigerator = $598
TO CALCULATE LOWER UTILITY COST PER YEAR
At a cost of only 12 cents per day
Annual cost will be 12 X 365 = 4380 Cents ($43.8)
Cost saved annually = Cost of old refrigerator – Cost of new
refrigerator.
Lower utility cost per year = $132 – $43.8
Lower utility cost per year = $88.2
How long would it take for the new refrigerator to pay for
itself in lower utility costs?
$598 ÷ $88.2
= 6.78 years
Approximately 7 years
<span> </span>
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
From the above information, we can deduce that the stock owned by Carol and Dave falls in value by $2,000 I.e ($10,000 - $8,000) ; it is to be noted that Carol solely has realised and recognized loss of $2,000.
Here, one of the cogent factors that determines whether a sale has taken place is if realization has been effected. Here, stock sold by Carol qualifies as a disposition while the decline in the value of stock sold by Dave does not qualify as disposition.
With regards to the foregoing, we can conclude that the federal income tax law treat the decline in the value of the stock differently for Carol and Dave.
