How did philosophies of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke differ

History

2 answers:

Anna71 [15]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Hobbes believed human beings were inherently at odds with each other and therefore needed an authoritarian government to rule over them.
Locke believed that human beings are morally neutral by nature, and can live side by side without a government -- but that creating a government makes society better.

Explanation:

Both English philosophers, Hobbes and Locke, believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people. But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.

Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in Leviathan in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War. He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and harmful toward one another as a result. Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.

John Locke published his Two Treatises on Civil Government in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England. Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings. Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.

In teaching about Hobbes and Locke, I've often described the difference between them in this way. If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way. Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved. Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith. But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke. :-)

jenyasd209 [6]2 years ago

6 0

Both Hobbes and Locke believe that people in the state of nature need to band together and create a society for the good or greater. Both believe that this society will protect people's lives from other people. However, Hobbes believes that people must give up much more in order to be protected than Locke believes.

~I hope this helps.

You might be interested in

A man made world event that would affect labor market would be a

Lemur [1.5K]

The correct answer is war

The notion of war is related to terms such as combat, battle, fight, fight or confrontation. In general, all of these concepts are interchangeable and synonymous, although each has a specific use that is better suited to the case. For example, it is correct to speak of "combat between boxers", but not of "war between boxers".

War refers, in its most usual sense, to armed struggle or war conflict between two or more nations or bands. It implies the disruption of a state of peace and gives rise to a confrontation with all types of weapons and which usually causes a high number of deaths.

5 0

2 years ago

What are Mongolians social classes?

GalinKa [24]

Like many nomadic pastoral cultures, the Mongols had a segmentary society, originally organized into a hierarchy of families, clans, tribes, and confederations. While social classes including nobility, herders, artisans, and slaves existed, the social structure was not completely rigid and social mobility was possible.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

juin [17]

This is B, the united states is divided into two separate systems: the Federal and State court systems.

3 0

1 year ago

Who are the philoffsifers (idek how to spell )

Jet001 [13]

A philosopher is someone who practices philosophy, which involves rational inquiry into areas that are outside of either theology or science.

8 0

3 years ago

Define political polarization as it applies to the Supreme Court.

atroni [7]

There are no options to arrive at the correct solution. I would answer this question from my research and hope that it comes to your help. Political polarization as it applies to the Supreme Court is when one justice refuses to work with the other justices on the bench. It starts acting like a political institution and it is not good.

7 0

3 years ago