Hello. You forgot to put the text to which the question refers, which makes it impossible for me to provide an exact answer. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
To answer this question it is necessary to read the entire text. The phrases that the author shows his opinion of Shakespeare's role in the future, will be the one in which the author shows an assumption about what he thinks will happen. These sentences are likely to be constructed using verbs in the future tense, so the author testifies that he is making an assumption, a projection, about what Shakespeare will represent.
Answer:
D. left
He left the train ticket at home.
Explanation:
means he left the train ticket at home.
Answer:
Because the father didn't obey so they then just kept the school opening that showed he didn't really obey anything and he always got threats etc.
Explanation:
Answer:
This is a trick question, because it does not say the answer must be truthful. There is no question that you cannot answer yes to, if you are willing to lie. Even the traditional "are you dead?" fails, because a living person can indeed answer untruthfully when asked it.
You see this is wrong. "Are you dead" cannot be answered yes to or else you would OBVIOUSLY NOT be dead, idiot.
For men that question would be "do I look fat in this dress?"
answer - short answer
Are you dead?
Are you alive?
Explanation:
It's important to understand that characterization, in general, refers to the process by which a characters motivations and personality is revealed to the readers of a certain book. There are two forms of characterization the first one is direct and the second is indirect. In direct characterization, the author reveals character traits and qualities in an explicit way. But in indirect characterization, the author reveals elements of the character in a more implicit way that means that he portrait characteristics through dialogue, speech or action.
It's also important to know that Mr. Utterson is the narrator of the novel, he is a middle-aged man, a lawyer and an old friend of Jekyll. With these ideas in mind the correct answer is "The author uses indirect characterization to show that Mr. Utterson is a concerned and caring friend."
The character in this excerpt talks about some characteristics of Jekyll in the past, as we read it we can see an indirect characterization of how the character of Mr. Utterson think, by these facts we know that he is worried and he thinks that probably Jekyll is in bad ways because of his changes. He is constantly watching Jekyll and he detects changes so as a good friend he starts to observe him. He is a very rational character so the author doesn't talk about him as a <em>deeply spiritual man</em>. Also, he is not <em>cruel or vengeful</em> since he was a food friend of Jekyll. He is a<em> judgmental person</em> but this is not a direct characterization because the author doesn't mention the characteristics of Mr.Utterson personality in the excerpt we infer it by the way he talks in the excerpt.